Search for: "English v. English"
Results 5201 - 5220
of 11,201
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2015, 7:06 pm
I haven’t had a chance to analyze yesterday’s Supreme Court decision in King v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 4:50 pm
Lyle reported on the decision for this blog, and Amy Howe covered the decision for us in Plain English. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:36 pm
This morning the Court announced its decision in King v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:25 pm
(Is there anyone who can express economics in plain English better than Roberts?) [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 12:20 pm
The opinion in King v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 10:28 am
(NEW 3:51) Amy’s “Plain English” coverage is here. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:21 am
The Inclusive Communities Project in Plain English. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:01 am
Burwell in Plain English. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 4:45 am
At Cato at Liberty, Ilya Shapiro looks at the remaining cases on the Court’s docket, while I do the same in Plain English for this blog. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
Equustek Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 5:06 pm
Let’s talk about those cases in Plain English. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 2:43 pm
On the one hand, the defendant here probably spoke fairly decent English himself, as evidenced by his ability to answer a few initial questions in English. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 1:20 pm
Circuit’s decision in Al Bahlul v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 6:36 am
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has issued a new decision in Flores v. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 4:56 am
Behold the case of British Academy of Songwriters, Composers And Authors & Ors, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation And Skills [2015] EWHC 1723 (BASCA v BIS for short). [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:16 am
Comm. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:54 am
Moreover, the agency continued these tactics in opposing the award of attorneys’ fees, and the defense was entitled to a supplemental award of attorneys’ fees for having to litigate the amount of fees (EEOC v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 4:56 am
In EEOC v Abercrombie & Fitch, the High Court reversed a 10th Circuit Court of Appeals' ruling that favored an employer's right to uphold a corporate dress code; in this case, it was Abercrombie's "no head wear" policy.The case involves the intersection of fashion, commerce and the freedom of religious expression under the First Amendment. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 3:26 am
– Pugh v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:00 am
Some Thoughts on Marei von Saher v. [read post]
