Search for: "Grant v. State" Results 5201 - 5220 of 61,137
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2012, 8:25 am
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court last week reversed itself on its ruling to maintaining a Pennsylvania state court thimerosal claim in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Bruesewitz v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 9:28 am by Tom Smith
It is apt to get Judge Sullivan’s attention that the only case the panel cited is United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 3:09 am by Matrix Legal  Information Team
The central question in the appeal was whether statements by the Secretary of State of her policy as regarded the granting of concessions outside the immigration rules and of changes to it amounted to statements as to “practice to be followed” within the meaning of the Immigration Act 1971, s 3(2), which would require her to lay such statements before Parliament. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 3:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Giving the lead judgment Lord Reed stated that the decisions taken to authorise the segregation under the Prison Rules 1999, rule 45(2), was not taken by the Secretary of State but instead by a senior prison officer. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 12:46 am
UNITED STATES, 526 U.S. 227 (1999), AND SCHMUCK v. [read post]