Search for: "High v State" Results 5201 - 5220 of 35,514
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2013, 8:06 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
District Court of the Eastern District of New York awarded interim attorneys’ fees and costs totaling $3,707,313.29 to Plaintiffs who intervened in the matter of United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 4:47 pm by Gen Sawyer
Coast GuardEnvironmental Protection AgencyWashington state Department of EcologyWhat’s going on in the area? [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 4:47 pm by Gen Sawyer
Coast GuardEnvironmental Protection AgencyWashington state Department of EcologyWhat’s going on in the area? [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 4:19 am by Giles Peaker
Partridge v Gupta (2017) EWHC 2110 (QB) Those who have been readers of this blog for a while may recall our campaign about evictions by High Court Sheriffs where the writs were (wrongly) obtained as an administrative act by using form N293A. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 4:19 am by Giles Peaker
Partridge v Gupta (2017) EWHC 2110 (QB) Those who have been readers of this blog for a while may recall our campaign about evictions by High Court Sheriffs where the writs were (wrongly) obtained as an administrative act by using form N293A. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
Sir Peter Openshaw (sitting as a judge of the High Court) held that 175 of the 178 breaches were proved to the criminal standard. [read post]
31 May 2011, 4:39 am by sally
(On the Application of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 1388 (Admin) (27 May 2011) High Court (Commercial Court) Awal Bank BSC v Al- Sanea [2011] EWHC 1354 (Comm) (27 May 2011) Hess Corp v Stena Drillmax III Ltd. [read post]
9 May 2014, 5:53 am by Joy Waltemath
” Accordingly, the state high court agreed that the demonstration constituted “speech” protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 9:22 am by Lyle Denniston
Hall decision allowing a state to be sued in another state’s courts (review limited to questions 2 and 3 in petition) Tuesday, December 8: Harris v. [read post]
10 Nov 2018, 11:16 am by Florian Mueller
On Tuesday I mostly wanted to publish the news quickly, and I focused on the commercial consequences.The legal standard applied by Judge Koh was stated as follows in the Ninth Circuit's 2006 opinion in Miller v. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
On 17 May 2019, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Serafin v Malkiewicz & Ors ([2019] EWCA Civ 852). [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 9:11 am by Kent Scheidegger
  Until that day comes, the exclusionary rule should be limited to bad-faith violations.The high court also took up Johnson v. [read post]