Search for: "House v. House" Results 5201 - 5220 of 41,226
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2010, 7:34 am by David Smith
Gallagher v Northern Ireland Housing Executive [2009] NICA 50 With the advent of the Land Registration Act 2002 and its new regime for dealing with adverse possession claims these cases are fast disappearing from the Court's of England & Wales. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 1:27 pm by Giles Peaker
The post Not that flexible. appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:22 am by Eleanor Winslet
The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has held in Johnson Controls v Campbell and Anor that there was no service provision change under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (“TUPE”) where a centralised taxi booking service was brought back in-house by the client. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 7:34 am by David Smith
Gallagher v Northern Ireland Housing Executive [2009] NICA 50 With the advent of the Land Registration Act 2002 and its new regime for dealing with adverse possession claims these cases are fast disappearing from the Court's of England & Wales. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 9:24 am by Giles Peaker
Ake v Lewisham Borough Council (2024) K40CL060 (Central London County Court 4 February 2024) (copy of judgment) This was a statutory appeal pursuant to section 204 of the Housing Act 1996 (‘the 1996 Act’), against a review decision made by Lewisham Borough Council on 27 February 2023. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 2:23 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On appeal from: [2018] EWCA Civ 844 This appeal considered whether a condition restricting the use of the premises should be implied into a planning permission granted by the appellant; alternatively, whether the planning permission should be interpreted as containing such a condition. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 10:56 am by Michael Froomkin
The Supreme Court recently addressed this very issue in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 3:05 pm by Richard Hunt
The recent decision from Judge Vanessa Bryant in Connecticut Fair Housing Center v. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 1:54 pm by Giles Peaker
The Tribunal’s starting point, as per Vadamalayan v Stewart and others (2020) UKUT 0183 (LC) (our note), was that section 43 Housing and Planning Act 2016 meant the full rent for the claimed period (less any housing benefit/UC) However, the Tribunal assumed standard accounting practice would apply, such that any payments by Ms A would first have been applied by Ms H to the outstanding arrears, before being allocated to the current rent. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 6:56 am by Florian Mueller
"It ought not to be the case that the house must burn down before we can restore the status quo. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 9:39 am by Giles Peaker
It was, as per Tickner v Hearn (1960) 1 WLR 1406 “a real hope coupled with the practical possibility of its fulfilment within a reasonable time. [read post]
31 May 2009, 10:24 am
The outsourcing of s.202 Housing Act 1996 reviews by local authorities to private, commercial bodies came under scrutiny in Charlotte Augustin v London Borough of Barnet, Central London County Court, 22 May 2009 (no report available online yet). [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:26 am by NL
Ali v Birmingham CC.The Court of Appeal gave these arguments short shrift. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:26 am by NL
Ali v Birmingham CC.The Court of Appeal gave these arguments short shrift. [read post]