Search for: "Little v. Little" Results 5201 - 5220 of 39,470
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2011, 7:04 am by John Elwood
  If you are facing a fridge full of leftovers, we have the legal equivalent for you today—a heaping helping of cases that are hanging around at One First Street N.E. a little longer than usual. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 1:18 pm
 Here's what the Court of Appeal says about it:"In Property Reserve v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:00 am by Eleanor Mitchell, Matrix
Their arguments were rejected by the Divisional Court but accepted by the Court of Appeal, which found that individuals in the relevant categories were few in number and capable of easy recognition, with little prospect of abuse and little need for monitoring (at [47], [74]). [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
The Court affirmed the decision rendered by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (which the AmeriKat analysed in detail here), observing that, if purchasers were allowed to replicate the invention, there would be a 'mismatch between invention and reward' and the patent would afford little protection to the inventor. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
Whilst his judgement is likely to be influential, it is nevertheless striking that another judge took the opposite approach, so the matter cannot be regarded as fully settled, and it is appropriate to analyse his reasoning in at least a little detail. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
Certainly, anyone who has spent even a little time on it will be aware that there are a lot of people out there with most decided views who are willing to share them, frequently and stridently. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 5:52 am
The case is Gintec International Import-Export GmbH v. [read post]