Search for: "Lively v. State" Results 5201 - 5220 of 29,017
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2021, 8:17 am by Chukwuma Okoli
The defendant/appellant argued that the cause of action arose exclusively in Kano State because that is where the deceased lived and died, and the defendant/appellant had obtained letters of administration issued by the Kano State High Court. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 3:00 pm by Josh Blackman
Blount did not hold himself out as a representative of the United States government. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 12:43 pm by Berin Szóka, Ari Cohn
  Hamburger insists otherwise, alluding to the Supreme Court’s 1946 decision in Marsh v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 7:10 am by Florian Mueller
Lenovo, by the way, is not merely defending itself super-successfully against Nokia's infringement cases, but also brought a FRAND complaint against the failed handset maker in the Northern District of California late last year (allegations of ambush tactics included).The state of play in Nokia v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
Under the UCCJEA, the “home state” is defined as “the state in which [the] child lived with a parent or a person acting as a parent for at least six consecutive months immediately before the commencement” of the proceeding (Domestic Relations Law § 75–a [7] ). [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
Under the UCCJEA, the “home state” is defined as “the state in which [the] child lived with a parent or a person acting as a parent for at least six consecutive months immediately before the commencement” of the proceeding (Domestic Relations Law § 75–a [7] ). [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
Pearson, stating that, “Canadians do not need to be liberated,” de Gaulle abruptly cut short his visit and left for France. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 8:47 am by ACLU
v=Gy7QRZ4uMu0What is the ACLU’s position on policing? [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 12:42 pm by Grayson Clary
If these facts sound familiar to Lawfare readers, it’s likely because of their resemblance to United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 11:24 am by Timothy Misner
In Bristol-Myers Squibb, the Supreme Court ruled that in mass tort actions, state courts do not have specific personal jurisdiction over claims by plaintiffs who were not injured in and do not live in the forum state. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” In addition, a slowly increasing number of states have extended Roe-like protection of abortion through constitutional and/or statutory provisions, so for the truly infinite future abortion freedom will depend even more so than it does at present on simply where a woman lives or what her ability to travel interstate may be. [read post]