Search for: "MAY v. US " Results 5201 - 5220 of 120,406
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2017, 5:15 am by SHG
Does that make us horrible people? [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 1:38 am
The industry typically relies on a combination of copyright, trade marks and passing off but each of these rights has drawbacks for the industry not least for copyright which offers limited protection for clone games following Nova v Mazooma [2007] EWCA Civ 219 (on IPKat here).Rosie reminds us that in the EU, a unregistered design right is automatic and lasts for 3 years from the date the design (e.g. a character in a video game) is first made available to the public. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 11:17 am by Shea Denning
  The name or title of the offense used in in the indictment or information to refer to the offense may not contain a reference to a previous conviction. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 9:22 am by Christine Corcos
” Although Holmes may not have seen the difference between this conclusion and the clear and present danger idea he offered contemporaneously in Schenck v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 9:22 am
” Although Holmes may not have seen the difference between this conclusion and the clear and present danger idea he offered contemporaneously in Schenck v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 11:15 pm
Our own review of California law on strict products liability persuades us that Bolger was correctly decided and that strict liability may attach under the circumstances of this case. [read post]