Search for: "Mark I. Congress"
Results 5201 - 5220
of 7,022
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2011, 10:46 pm
But I cannot teach anyone on this Earth--or where I work--to have self-respect. [read post]
12 May 2011, 1:22 pm
Neuman: I think if you look at everything in today’s terms, because there’s a scarcity of top-level domains, especially in the generic space, I think there’s certainly a belief by trademark owners that in order to adequately police their mark they’re going to have register at every top-level domain. [read post]
12 May 2011, 11:45 am
" I spoke about the urgent need for smart reforms to our criminal justice system — alongside members of Right on Crime (a conservative group led by Newt Gingrich), district attorneys, chief justices, and Mark Earley (former Republican Virginia Attorney General and CEO of faith-based Prison Fellowship Ministries). [read post]
11 May 2011, 9:43 am
State Department Spokesman Mark Toner said yesterday: [More....] [read post]
11 May 2011, 2:15 am
Although the two bills have import differences, both would mark a significant step in the regulation of the collection and use of personal information. [read post]
10 May 2011, 1:46 pm
In 1802, for instance, the Seventh Congress specifically exempted religious bodies from real estate taxes. [read post]
10 May 2011, 11:42 am
There were no protections for FBI whistleblowers during Mark Felt's time. [read post]
6 May 2011, 8:24 pm
"I don't have time to do this," you think. [read post]
6 May 2011, 4:17 pm
I, § 8, cl. 8. [read post]
6 May 2011, 9:00 am
The Treaty marks a significant step in bilateral cooperation between the United States and India. [read post]
6 May 2011, 8:09 am
As I am sure you know, this year marks the start of the Civil War's sesquicentennial. [read post]
5 May 2011, 10:05 am
Congress. [read post]
5 May 2011, 8:50 am
(See the video of the hearing here, beginning at the 25:00 mark.) [read post]
5 May 2011, 5:00 am
Congress made it clear that once a debt is discharged, the debtor should not be pressured in any way to repay it. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:13 am
For a number of reasons, which I will revisit obliquely in a moment, I decided against providing any immediate analysis. [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:05 am
I received an email this weekend from a reader questioning whether the Marks test could be considered here based on the fact that Justice Thomas did not technically “concur in judgment. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 4:38 pm
’” See Marks v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 9:25 pm
This is followed by a LETTER TO CONGRESS from Gary Locke, Secretary of Commerce at The Department of Commerce (DOC). [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 7:56 pm
I had no idea. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 7:56 pm
I had no idea. [read post]
