Search for: "Office of Hearing and Appeals"
Results 5201 - 5220
of 23,873
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2020, 4:02 am
Today the justices will hear argument in one case, United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
"The Appellate Division then noted that the Court of Appeals in its decision in Palmer v Merges, 37 NY2d 177, observed that the rule authorizing a second probationary term, "if properly executed, is largely beneficial to the employee" and "[i]n determining whether another probationary term is necessary as the only alternative to dismissal, the administrator should be given latitude in defining a different assignment' for purposes of fresh evaluation. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
"The Appellate Division then noted that the Court of Appeals in its decision in Palmer v Merges, 37 NY2d 177, observed that the rule authorizing a second probationary term, "if properly executed, is largely beneficial to the employee" and "[i]n determining whether another probationary term is necessary as the only alternative to dismissal, the administrator should be given latitude in defining a different assignment' for purposes of fresh evaluation. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 3:38 am
The VSEA (labor union) appealed to the Labor Relations Board. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 3:16 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States declined to hear Rodney Reed’s case on Monday, noting that the trial court in Texas will hear his case later this year. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 12:40 pm
Reed’s case or whether the Court would hear future claims. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 12:33 pm
Next term the justices will hear oral argument in Fulton v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 11:17 am
The Trump Administration appealed the decision, setting the stage for the Supreme Court to hear arguments in the case next week. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 9:59 am
The committee will hear testimony from Gen. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 8:50 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit disagreed. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 7:01 am
The Tennessee Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal as improperly perfected.) [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 6:02 am
The plaintiffs and the public interest groups contend that the district courts must hear these constitutional challenges before the administrative trials, and that forcing a litigant to wait until an appeal that follows a long and expensive administrative process also deprives litigants of constitutional protections. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 8:13 pm
The Federal Court of Appeal recently released a decision in Democracy Watch v. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 8:54 am
Examiners in the hearing often highlight that it is important to see how a case plays out in the supreme court first. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 4:12 am
Tagnetics has appealed the Settlement Enforcement Order to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio (the “District Court”), stating one issue on appeal: “The Bankruptcy Court erred when it held that the parties’ settlement agreement did not include a release of Tagnetics’ affiliates, subsidiaries, parent corporation, officers, and directors. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 4:53 pm
Also welcome is the confirmation that the regulator’s decisions will be subject to a statutory appeals process through the courts, in much the same way as the findings of the UK Information Commissioner’s Office are subject to appeal through the First Tier Information Rights Tribunal and Ofcom’s decisions, within its current remit, can be challenged in the Competition Appeals Tribunal. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 10:37 am
The court of appeals affirmed. 581 S.W.3d 306. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
”The Hearing Officer found that the Authority had given "each of the applicants additional compensation to increase their final average salaries so that their pensions would equal what their pensions would have been had they been eligible for the retirement incentive and taken it in December 2002" and ruled that the ERS had acted reasonably in excluding the allowance payments from final average salary, concluding that ERS "had the authority to determine what… [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
”The Hearing Officer found that the Authority had given "each of the applicants additional compensation to increase their final average salaries so that their pensions would equal what their pensions would have been had they been eligible for the retirement incentive and taken it in December 2002" and ruled that the ERS had acted reasonably in excluding the allowance payments from final average salary, concluding that ERS "had the authority to determine what… [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
”The Hearing Officer found that the Authority had given "each of the applicants additional compensation to increase their final average salaries so that their pensions would equal what their pensions would have been had they been eligible for the retirement incentive and taken it in December 2002" and ruled that the ERS had acted reasonably in excluding the allowance payments from final average salary, concluding that ERS "had the authority to determine what… [read post]
