Search for: "Public Service Co. v. State"
Results 5201 - 5220
of 5,844
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2009, 11:43 am
In Northern Indiana Public Service Co. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 7:00 am
Read more … Exemptions Great Oaks Water Co. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 4:09 am
In New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 4:09 am
In New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 2:04 am
United Parcel Service General Services Co. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 2:04 am
United Parcel Service General Services Co. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(ITC 337 Law Blog) Academic perspectives on issues raised in Bilski case (IP Osgoode) Star Scientific teaches a valuable lesson to all IP share investors (IAM) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Appealing BPAI rejections to the Federal Circuit: In re Baggett (nonprecedential) (Patently-O) CAFC: Preliminary injunctions and obviousness in design patent law: Titan Tire Corp v Case New Holland, Inc (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: Post-filing assignment cannot create standing:… [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 4:46 am
Both the RCMP and the Canadian Security Intelligent Service (CSIS) have similarly stated they both have no evidence against him. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 7:36 am
From the February sitting: Atlantic Sounding Co., Inc., et al. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 3:12 am
The Prudential Insurance Co., App. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 10:07 am
Suffolk Co. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 8:45 am
Indeed, no reported California state court decision has endorsed the Ninth Circuit’s reasoning, and we are of the view that California courts “have been clear in their expression that section 16600 represents a strong public policy of the state which should not be diluted by judicial fiat. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 6:33 am
See Callaway Golf Co. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 5:15 am
Centanni, Chancery Div., Family Part, Monmouth Co. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 1:30 am
Co. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
Tip Scales to 51 Percent Share of New Patents’ (IP finance) Global - Copyright Copyright treaty backing e-books for visually impaired readers survives US and EU resistance (Out-Law) (WIPO) (IPKat) Brazil Brazilian Patent and Trademark Office new fee schedule (IP tango) Canada Canadian Trademarks Opposition Board finds colour green not distinctive of applicant: 3M Company v Tape Specialities Limited (ipblog.ca) Conference Board of Canada… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
Tip Scales to 51 Percent Share of New Patents’ (IP finance) Global - Copyright Copyright treaty backing e-books for visually impaired readers survives US and EU resistance (Out-Law) (WIPO) (IPKat) Brazil Brazilian Patent and Trademark Office new fee schedule (IP tango) Canada Canadian Trademarks Opposition Board finds colour green not distinctive of applicant: 3M Company v Tape Specialities Limited (ipblog.ca) Conference Board of Canada… [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 3:25 pm
The book is really a manual ... a guide to disability leave entitlement for New York Public Employees involved in law enforcement and fire fighting. [read post]
