Search for: "State v. Country" Results 5201 - 5220 of 26,688
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2021, 2:25 am by Hannah McAslan (UK) and Patty Tan
Since posting this update, we understand that there have been further developments in several EU27 Member States as to the temporary transitional measures that are available, and we have updated our summary table to reflect these developments. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
Alternatively, such proceedings may be brought before the courts of the Member State where the data subject has his or her habitual residence, unless the controller or processor is a public authority of a Member State acting in the exercise of its public powers. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 11:58 am by Chase Strangio
” And we now have a president who is planning to follow the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Bostock v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 3:34 pm by David Greene
Of course not, and that’s why EFF filed an amicus brief in Lafayette City v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 2:11 pm by Unknown
Smith (Assimilative Crimes Act; Indian Country Crimes Act)State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.htmlJesse S. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 6:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
 United States .v Schultz, 333 F.3d 393 (2nd Cir. 2003); United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 6:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
 United States .v Schultz, 333 F.3d 393 (2nd Cir. 2003); United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 6:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
 United States .v Schultz, 333 F.3d 393 (2nd Cir. 2003); United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 5:16 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here are the notices of withdrawal of laches as a defense in United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The relevant constitutional provision, in Section 2 of Article II, states that the President “shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment. [read post]
Saraf’s petition argues that the AIBE Rules violate established precedent by the Supreme Court in the cases of V Sudheer v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 8:15 am by Steve Gottlieb
If anyone cares, the Founders of our country would have agreed – liberty, to them, meant the right to vote and by their votes choose their leaders. [read post]