Search for: "State v. Doctor" Results 5201 - 5220 of 9,597
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2014, 10:00 pm
Her doctors stated that the preexisting condition was temporarily aggravated by the chemicals, but not worsened. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 4:33 am by David DePaolo
The thought behind this was that if the parties could not agree which medical professional was going to govern the case then the government would decide, thus cutting down on litigation, ergo costs, and resulting in less dispute.The theory didn't translate into practice and one of the more common complaints I hear as I travel the state is that the QME process a) doesn't work as intended, b) is not timely, c) doesn't have enough physicians who know what they're doing, and… [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The United States government could take on the role of “insurer” in the sense that it would use revenues to pay doctors, hospitals, and others for providing treatment to all Americans. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 6:12 am by Joy Waltemath
Although HHC wrote to his doctor stating that 75 percent of his duties involved on-site construction supervision, there was evidence that during the decades he worked from the central office, he did office work 80 percent of the time and only spent 20 percent onsite. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 4:15 am by David DePaolo
In Washington this is fatal.The case is Knight v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 9:59 pm by Marcus Epstein
  The 1943 Supreme Court decision Parker v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 6:30 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Declaration of IndependenceUnited States Constitution In its recent decision in the medical malpractice case of Cordes v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
” Second, the drug is neither prescribed by a doctor or psychiatrist nor dispensed by a pharmacist, and has not been studied in the United States to determine its interaction with other drugs. [read post]