Search for: "The United States, Petitioner" Results 5201 - 5220 of 8,961
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2013, 11:17 am by Dennis Crouch
The focus of the case is location – and, what is meant by an "offer to sell . . . within the United States" under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 6:44 am by Joy Waltemath
According to the Sixth Circuit, the measure to amend the state’s constitution to prohibit the state, state universities, and all other state entities from discriminating against or granting preferential treatment based on race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin violated equal protection under the political process theory because equal protection does not permit the kind of political restructuring that the measure affected. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 2:22 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Petitioner asserted that the Court had jurisdiction pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 11603(a) and (b), since "Petitioner and Respondent jointly own residential property in this judicial district and ... the children that are the subject of this action were transported into the United States through airports located in ... [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 2:18 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Petitioner filed his Petition for return of Children and Motion Warrant in Lieu of Habeas Corpus in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada on August 30, 2013. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 2:16 pm by Joel R. Brandes
The Court found that at the time the Child traveled to the United States in the fall of 2011, both of her parents intended that she move to the United States. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 7:40 am by John H Curley
     In view of the forgoing, respondent has met its burden of showing that petitioner does not demonstrate any statutory basis for vacating or modyfyibg the ward, and therefore, failed to state a cause of action. ... [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 10:35 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 That's the question in The Board of Education of Roxana Community Unit School District No. 1 v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 11:59 am
As reported by Eriq Gardner in the HollywoodReporter.com on October 1, 2013, the United States Supreme Court has agreed to hear arguments regarding the dismissal of the heirs lawsuit which claims rights to the film Raging Bull and seeks damages from MGM and 20th Century Fox for alleged infringement of copyrights. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 5:53 pm
Institutional Architecture of Law and Governance:  The United States and Law Making--The Administrative Branches: The Non-Delegation Doctrine, An Introduction. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 6:45 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States – not really an Indian law petition but does involve the challenge to the conviction of a former associate of Jack Abramoff. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 7:22 pm
He notes that no guardian has been appointed for the infant in the United States or Greece, and the will does not designate a trustee or create a trust. [read post]
28 Sep 2013, 3:55 pm
The defendant cites no facts from anywhere in the United States outside New York City to establish that American citizens overwhelmingly chose air guns for the core lawful purpose of self-defense, rather than for sports and recreation. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 3:03 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The Assistant District Attorney also states that, information detailing the location time and date of the report may tend to identify the victim, and therefore the petitioners request for affidavits, interviews conducted, investigators reports, notes, precinct police department index sheets, police officers memo book entries, evidentiary photographs, exhibits crime scene unit reports crime scene photographs crime scene map/schematics police maps/diagrams laboratory… [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 6:00 am
Constitution; and, • Favorable disposition toward the United States For more information and Natz resources, please check out our website. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
 By way of rejoinder, the United States insisted that the parties had not relied upon the documents, before the lower court or in their appeals briefing. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 4:07 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
USCIS initially denied the case in January 2013 by stating that the petitioner has not provided sufficient evidence to show that the beneficiary qualifies to perform the job duties of the proffered position. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 8:43 pm by JP Sarmiento
She will come to the United States and will marry her fiancé within 90 days of her entry. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 7:44 pm by Mary Dwyer
The petitions of the day are: Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]