Search for: "UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK" Results 5201 - 5220 of 7,218
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2011, 7:11 am by Kevin Houchin
We checked the database at the United States Patent & Trademark Office and they haven’t registered the brand. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 2:08 pm by Aurelia Mitchell Durant
  Trademark protection in the United States includes registration with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 8:53 am by Gene Quinn
The United States Patent and Trademark Office has just announced the expansion of the PCT-PPH pilot program with the Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO), as well as two new PPH pilot programs; a new pilot project for the Patent Prosecution Highway with the Nordic Patent Institute (NPI) based on NPI’s Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) work products and a new pilot project for the Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) with… [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 4:27 am by Marie Louise
Omega SA v Omega Engineering Incorporated (IPKat) PCC Page 30: Managing your tentacles: Cautious Co and IPOff Ltd (PatLit) (PatLit) The UK Patent Box – more details, not necessarily much more clarification (IP finance) (IP finance) (Solo IP) (IP finance) (Intellectual Property Tax) Gaston Kroub on the UKIPO ‘Green Channel’ initiative two years In (Part I – Green Patent Blog) (Part II – Green Patent Blog)   United States… [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 1:12 pm by Morris Turek
  Optimally, a trademark license should also explicitly state: whether the license is exclusive or non-exclusive the duration of the license whether the license may be renewed and under what conditions the amount of any royalty payments or other compensation due to the licensor and when those payments are to be made the responsibilities of both parties upon the termination or expiration of the license the consequences of breaching the license and the time in which the breach… [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 4:33 am by Brian Scott
United States law all or part of this article may be confusing or unclear.In the United States, copyright law has changed several times since the founding of the country. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 7:45 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The marks on the merchandise were identical to and substantially indistinguishable from marks used on genuine merchandise, and were in use and registered for such goods on the principle register of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 7:45 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The marks on the merchandise were identical to and substantially indistinguishable from marks used on genuine merchandise, and were in use and registered for such goods on the principle register of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:54 am by Marie Louise
Crowdsourcing commercialised (IPKat) P2P (seminar): the aftermath (IPKat) Hargreaves Review (Kluwer Patent Blog)   United States US Patents Microsoft joins Article One’s new preemptive troll-fighting service (The Prior Art)   US Patents – Decisions Supreme Court affirms high standard of proving patents invalid – Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Limited Partnership (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (Patent Arcade)… [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 4:16 pm by Kiera Flynn
Hyatt Docket: 10-1219 Issue(s):  Whether a plaintiff, who is appealing the denial of an application of a patent by commencing a civil action against the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) in a federal district court pursuant to 35 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 3:18 am by Woodrow Pollack
Because records from the United States Patent and Trademark Office are (1) central to Plaintiff’s claims of trademark infringement and unfair competition and (2) a public record that Plaintiff has not disputed, the Court may consider the records in resolving a motion to dismiss. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am by Marie Louise
Activ8-3D (EPLAW) EWPCC deals with unregistered designs: Access plus inspiration need not mean copying: Albert Packaging v Nampak (Class 99) (IPKat) United States US Patent Reform Patent Reform Update: Will the House pass America Invents Act? [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 2:15 pm by Andrew Goldberg
“Neither the junior most clerk in a federal agency nor the President of the United States may spend a dollar from the Treasury for any purpose unless Congress has by law appropriated that dollar for that purpose,” he wrote. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 2:15 pm by Andrew Goldberg
“Neither the junior most clerk in a federal agency nor the President of the United States may spend a dollar from the Treasury for any purpose unless Congress has by law appropriated that dollar for that purpose,” he wrote. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 2:15 pm by Andrew Goldberg
“Neither the junior most clerk in a federal agency nor the President of the United States may spend a dollar from the Treasury for any purpose unless Congress has by law appropriated that dollar for that purpose,” he wrote. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 10:22 pm
The parties agreed that, more than a year before filing its patent application, i4i had sold a software program known as S4 in the United States, but they disagreed over whether that software embodied the invention claimed in i4i's patent. [read post]