Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 5201 - 5220
of 10,392
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am
Nevertheless, the newspaper repeated the defamation: in an article alongside a photograph of Watters the newspaper had stated: We may have to apologise to this revolting pervert but will we mean it? [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 5:00 am
§337(a), which states:“[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of this chapter [the entire FDCA] shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 12:14 pm
”So, what’s the future hold for Google’s mark? [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 8:08 am
Let me know via Twitter @plagiarismtoday. 1: Supreme Court Hears Copyright Battle Between Google and Oracle First off today, Adam Liptak at The New York Times reports that the Supreme Court of the United States heard arguments in the Google v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
Isaac Goldstein, D2010-0279 (WIPO May 7, 2010) (Parties in the United States and Hong Kong). [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 1:20 pm
Co. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 6:02 am
The changes in the market for D&O insurance cannot be traced to a single source but are instead the result of a confluence of factors, including: The rise of litigation finance firms; The United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 7:30 am
Finally, at the Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr weighs in on the first question presented in United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 1:23 pm
Stitt and United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 9:00 am
United States, 371 U.S. 156, 167 (1962) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 2:00 am
(PatLit) United States US General House approves USPTO funding bill (Managing Intellectual Property) US measures to strengthen trade enforcement (Intellectual Property Watch) US Patents Peer-to-patent project set on hold. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 10:00 am
The allegedly infringed artwork had registered with the United States Copyright Office prior to the creation by the league of the Gull logo and the allegedly infringed logo and the acquired logo appeared to be exactly the same. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:02 am
Mark Meadows (1:23-cv-03621) (civil removal proceedings) GA (Clark): The State of Georgia v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 12:01 pm
Nevertheless, the United States and Russia will continue discussions on deconfliction in Syrian airspace. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:50 am
Lifestyle Equities C.V. and another v Ahmed and another, heard 20th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March 2023 R (on the application of Toraane and another) v… [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 6:30 am
As David points out very early, the Court recognized and embraced implied powers fourteen years earlier, in United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 12:48 pm
Number Word Mark 6171625 GANT COIN 6186820 GRASTON 6185288 ACTIVE CARE 6184959 A&A SURFACES 6184958 A&A SURFACES 6184505 SERENSNIPPITY ORGANIC INSPIRED HAIR SALON 6184477 LEGAL SOLUTIONS, PRACTICAL ADVICE 6184413 MARCH MADNESS 6184187 COMMAND GRILLE 6184171 JAVA WAVE 6184117 LUMALUXE 6183997 ZAAD 6186996 INDY HEMATOLOGY EDUCATION 6186778 RECYCLED WEALTH 6183837 COOL SCIENCE MATTERS 6183734 MARINE 31 6183733 MARINE 31 6186699 ESPERTA 6186975 REAL. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 7:06 am
The United States Supreme Court is already considering a related issue, the extent of immunity for prosecutors who fabricate evidence, in Pottawattamie County v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 3:24 pm
Raich, 545 U.S. 1, 23-24 (2005) (quoting United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 8:45 am
United States v. [read post]
