Search for: "A----. B v. C----. D" Results 5221 - 5240 of 10,370
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2010, 9:57 am
One thing it doesn't have is an official Department of Déjà Vu. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 4:49 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Lemley: innovation often goes along w/having to take a license b/c of patent threats. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 2:49 am
 That at least appears to be conclusion drawn by any reasonable Kat rom the ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case C‑561/11 Fédération Cynologique Internationale v Federación Canina Internacional de Perros de Pura Raza, which was published on Curia today. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 1:55 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
The ruling by the CJEU in C-123/20 is not expected before end of 2021. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 10:14 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Case law tells us that the following factors help situate a worker on this continuum: a) level of worker control; b) ownership of equipment and tools; c) profit/lost opportunity; and d) business integration. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 1:24 am
§4 shall apply to accidents and dates of disablement which occur on and after such effective date; b. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
 The Case is C-46/10 Viking Gas A/S v Kosan Gas A/S, formerly BP Gas A/S, a reference for a preliminary ruling under from the Danish Højesteret [the IPKat interjects to add that, since the Danes are so good at speaking other languages, it is easy to forget that they speak Danish too: Højesteret is the Danish for 'Supreme Court' and is not, as Merpel mischievously tells people, a tasty dessert]. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 5:40 am by Bexis
 Id. at §§353a(b)(1)(D); 353a(b)(3)(B)(ii). [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Mabry, No. 06-2324, 06-2322 Defendants' convictions and sentences for conspiring to solicit and obtain prohibited payments from union contractors, and for soliciting and obtaining such payments, in violation of the Taft-Hartley Act, are affirmed over claims that: 1) the informal resolution of a payment dispute qualified as a "settlement" under 29 U.S.C. section 186(c)(2); 2) insufficient evidence presented at trial to support a finding that the exception to liability under… [read post]
23 Jan 2025, 6:57 am by Nasseri Legal
“Bu platformun en büyük avantajı, futboldan krikete ve basketbola kadar geniş bir yelpazede bahis yapabilme olanağı sunmasıdır. [read post]
20 Jan 2025, 12:47 pm by Nasseri Legal
Ən Son Bonuslar, Yeniləmələr Və Pulsuz Bahislərdən Xəbərdar Olun Pin-up Tr Ödemeleri: Afin De Yatırma Ve Çekme Para Için Oynamak Için Durante Popüler Slot Makineleri Hangileridir? [read post]