Search for: "Best v. State Bar"
Results 5221 - 5240
of 5,424
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2012, 1:39 am
It is fair to say that many in the copyright bar may have initially underestimated the shift that was underway. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 7:16 am
Case Study: Baden v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 5:19 am
v=lzatElTvT6U. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm
As many LHB readers are aware, the Law and Society Association hosts "Collaborative Research Networks" that sponsors panels for its annual meeting. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
As stated by Chief Justice Wagner, our courts should provide “good justice for everyone, not perfect justice for a lucky few. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:14 am
Surveys, testimony, observing online behavior are all different sources of empirical evidence: searches originating on Amazon v. searches originating on Google. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 7:21 pm
With some contests, you can win by choosing the most winners and not necessarily the best winners. [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:09 pm
It was a carefully planned case, and presumably, it would not have launched unless the plaintiffs believed that they had the best possible evidence. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 11:45 am
Assn. of United States, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm
[vii] Compliance with Regulation D does not assure compliance with applicable state securities laws. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 2:18 pm
******************** Imagine that you have a history of heart disease in your family, so you hire a cardiologist each quarter to undergo various testing and to discuss the best exercise, diet and other steps to stay healthy. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:18 am
Americans v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 4:55 pm
Last year, the American Bar Association reported in its annual Legal Technology Survey that one in four firms with at least 100 attorneys have experienced data breaches involving hackers, website attacks or stolen or lost smartphones, tablets or laptop computers. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 6:26 pm
At her confirmation hearing, Ginsburg recounted “many indignities” that she endured because of her gender while in law school but that, she said, “one accepted as just part of the scenery,” such as the time that a male employee told her that women were barred from a particular room in the library, which she needed to enter as part of her work for the law review. [read post]
15 May 2011, 9:32 am
Kevin Q. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 2:02 pm
(Citizens United itself overruled a 20-year old precedent, Austin v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:43 am
Filed 3/29/11 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE JSM TUSCANY, LLC et al., Petitioners, v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Securities Litigation, 768 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 2014) (violations of Section 303 do not give rise to private right of action under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5) with Stratte-McClure v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:25 pm
(For those interested in how these cases relate to each other and in how much McKay J. was ahead of his time in his analysis, see a 1951 Canadian Bar Review comment by C.B. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 9:01 am
Moreover, § 1834(a)(17)(B) bars payments to a DME supplier that knowingly submits a claim that was generated as a result of a prohibited telephone solicitation. [read post]
