Search for: "Chief Justice of the United States"
Results 5221 - 5240
of 14,932
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2018, 6:43 am
”) United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 5:30 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 3:31 am
It is the only case being heard that day, so Chief Justice John G. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 5:06 am
We take our oath to defend the United States Constitution. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 12:47 pm
But the problem, although it is admittedly not the highest-profile problem in the United States, is an important problem for the administration of justice. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 4:12 pm
The International Military Tribunal (IMT) and the United States Nuremberg Military Tribunals (NMT) tried Nazi leaders for war crimes and crimes against humanity. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 11:00 am
It can’t tell courts how to decide cases (again, absent a change in the substantive law on which the case is based), see United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 3:44 pm
United States, which is cited as good authority in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 12:49 am
Here is the abstract: In the 2010 United States Supreme Court cases, Holder v. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 12:09 pm
The CHIEF JUSTICE. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 5:54 pm
He finds that in the views of the dissent in the Holm case:the court agrees with Chief Justice Durham['s dissent] that the “purports to marry” prong should be interpreted “as referring to an individual’s claim of entry into a legal union recognized by the state as marriage. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 6:55 pm
Arguing on behalf of the United States, Deputy Solicitor General Ian Gershengorn tried to turn the case around. [read post]
21 May 2010, 9:09 am
Chief Judge David Sentelle’s opinion (joined by Judge David Tatel and Senior Judge Harry Edwards) opens: Three detainees at Bagram Air Force Base in Afghanistan petitioned the district court for habeas corpus relief from their confinement by the United States military.1 Appellants (collectively “the United States” or “the government”) moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction based on § 7(a) of the Military… [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 10:34 pm
If you live in the United States, you're probably aware that CNN and YouTube are co-sponsoring a Republican presidential debate tomorrow evening. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:04 am
The New York Times reports that “three decades of ever-escalating deaths from drug overdoses in the United States have come to an end, according to preliminary government data made public Wednesday. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 9:29 am
“Diversity, equity and inclusion in the military are necessities for the United States,” according to Bishop Garrison, a senior advisor to Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin who worked as a defense and homeland security official under Obama and a foreign policy advisor on Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 3:58 am
Why should the justices of the Supreme Court of the United States be the only high officials who are insulated from public disapproval? [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 8:47 am
United States. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 12:01 pm
In an opinion by Chief Justice John Roberts, the court concluded that the principles underlying the general presumption that U.S. law does not apply outside the United States also apply to the ATS. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 2:31 pm
Last year, the United States Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Missouri vs. [read post]
