Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 5221 - 5240
of 48,974
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2010, 10:38 am
Here’s the part that caught our attention: Edward V. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:30 pm
Section 113(g)(2) refers to initial and subsequent actions to recover costs specifically under § 107, not contribution claims under § 113(g). [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:02 am
North Cumbria was awarded its costs. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 2:02 pm
Co. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2021, 8:33 am
Case citation: Golden v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 3:22 am
The Supreme Court found that the ‘real defendant’ test (as set out in TGA Chapman Ltd v Christopher, 1998) is useful when assessing whether an insurer should be liable for costs where a claim is partly covered by insurance but some part is outside the limits of cover. [read post]
7 May 2015, 12:55 pm
Co. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 7:49 am
The Law Offices of Leah V. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 12:02 pm
See, e.g., Building Industry Legal Defense Foundation v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 12:55 pm
Paul was entitled under Buss v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 1:06 pm
The compensation amount under Section 1.61 21(f)(5)(iii) remains unchanged at $215,000.The Code provides that the $1,000,000,000 threshold used to determine whether a multiemployer plan is a systematically important plan under section 432(e)(9)(H)(v)(III)(aa) is adjusted using the cost-of-living adjustment provided under Section 432(e)(9)(H)(v)(III)(bb). [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 9:15 am
(Grant v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am
The district court dismissed all claims against all defendants on the basis of Eleventh Amendment immunity and later awarded costs of $8,484.62 to defendants. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 1:01 pm
Never mind, the US Supreme Court has already agonised over these issues in Eldred v Ashcroft and Golan v Holder so we can be comforted that they weren't a problem after all. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 3:00 am
Airways v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 9:00 pm
In case of breach of contract, the damages will usually be assessed by considering the situation the creditor would be in if restored to the position he would have been in had the contract been performed properly, by looking at costs incurred, wasted expenditure, any loss of profits etc. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 12:47 am
Co. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 7:45 am
-Alabama v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 10:15 am
United States Supreme Court Stern v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 1:42 am
Plaintiff was given the option of having a mistrial declared against the defendant, severing that defendant for a separate trial, limiting the defendant's voir dire with an instruction to the new jury panel regarding the basis for the limitation, excluding defendant's infringement expert from trial, and paying all the parties' costs and attorneys' fees for the first jury selection as well as the plaintiff's costs and attorneys' fees for the second… [read post]
