Search for: "Defendants A-F" Results 5221 - 5240 of 29,824
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2019, 7:55 am by Cindy Cohn
The district court was required to use those procedures (contained in section 1806(f) of FISA). [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 9:54 am by Rebecca Tushnet
UAV Corp., 517 F.3d 1137 (9th Cir. 2008), the Lanham Act claims failed. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 4:37 am by Andrew Frisch
  During the pendency of his lawsuit, the defendant-restaurant sent the plaintiff, an offer of judgment (OJ) pursuant to FRCP 68(a), which the plaintiff accepted. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm by David Kris
With a few more days to read the inspector general’s Crossfire Hurricane report and watch the C-SPAN video of his congressional testimony (and listen to the no-bull version on Lawfare), I have five additional observations beyond those set out in a series of tweets on the day the report was released, discussions on the Lawfare podcast the following day, and conversations with NPR, the New York Times, and the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 10:05 am by Patrick@nimblelight.com
Additionally, for some offenses, under 18 U.S.C. 3142(e) there is a rebuttable presumption that defendants accused of certain offenses are not eligible for pretrial release under any conditions or combination of conditions. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:11 am by Eugene Volokh
, 507 F.2d 1084, 1092 (5th Cir. 1975) (en banc) ("It does not appear that defendant fails to impose grooming standards for female employees; thus in this respect each sex is treated equally…. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 3:28 am by SHG
When the victim’s co-worker tried to intervene, the attacker allegedly screeched, “You’re gonna defend this f——g b—-h? [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 8:07 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
  Peter Mavrick is Fort Lauderdale employment lawyer who has extensive experience in defending businesses and business owners against claims of discrimination. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
(f) Substitution This factor requires consideration of whether the blocked websites may be replaced or substituted by another infringing website. [read post]