Search for: "Deter v. Deter"
Results 5221 - 5240
of 5,291
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2021, 7:06 am
The Federal Government must improve its efforts to identify, deter, protect against, detect, and respond to these actions and actors. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:32 pm
Furthermore, the result of the decision in Thornton v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:33 pm
Success in that forum will depend in the first instance on the willingness and ability of leadership at the FTC and Antitrust Division to staff and sustain the merger challenges, non-merger civil actions, and (in the case of the Antitrust Division) criminal prosecutions that will optimize moving antitrust law forward while cost-effectively preventing competition-diminishing mergers,[15] remedying civil antitrust law violations, and punishing and deterring criminal… [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 1:37 am
Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 1:48 pm
They wrote: "[T]he conduct of the participating employees and other individuals had the potential to influence other employees to withhold their labor, or to deter suppliers or their employees from attempting to enter the clinic. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 12:38 pm
Golan v. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 4:00 am
In Bartos v Scottish Legal Complaints Commission 2015 SC 690, at its own instance the court raised a question as to the proper approach to certain provisions in the Legal Profession and Legal Aid (Scotland) Act 2007 (the Act). [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:01 am
Trial in The People of the State of New York vs. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 8:22 am
The Department also has available to it a portion of certain fraud prevention and detection fees charged to applicants for H- and L- category visas. 8 U.S.C. 1356(v)(2)(A). [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 10:39 pm
In this case, it was Hirst v UK (No2). [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 8:52 am
(Expression v. traditional advertising may have something to do with the differences here—NFU is problematic perhaps because it spans both types of uses, whereas Rogers is for expression that isn’t standard advertising.) [read post]
How Has Blockchain Technology Fared in China? –from a case study of LRB to the most recent NFT cases
27 Mar 2023, 9:50 am
Regulatory documents, such as the Notice on Further Preventing and Disposing of Hype Risks in Virtual Currency Transactions, have been published to deter NFT-related hype. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 12:24 am
As a common law principle, the banking sector has long functioned under the value of confidentiality, largely embodied in the famous 1924 United Kingdom decision, Tournier v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:08 pm
At the same time, shareholder advocates became concerned that these types of bylaws could deter even meritorious litigation. [read post]
18 Sep 2006, 8:40 am
***Viral V. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 3:20 pm
In addition to the violations surrounding hypothetical performance, one adviser was also found to have (i) made false and misleading statements, (ii) advertised misleading model performance, (iii) been unable to substantiate performance shown in its advertisements, (iv) failed to enter into written agreements with people it compensated for endorsements, and (v) violated recordkeeping and compliance standards including filing a prospectus with the SEC which contained misleading statements… [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 9:14 am
v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 4:54 am
The following is that part of Chapter Law 56 2009 of the State of New York which relates to Rockefeller drug reform legislation. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
The Securities and Exchange Commission regulations on climate disclosure, first proposed in March 2022 and likely to be issued in final form in October 2023,[1] have drawn considerable controversy and face an uncertain fate in the inevitable litigation.[2] Much less attention has gone to two bills that are moving toward adoption in California. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 8:59 am
§115(d)(3)(E)(v)] The database must also be made available “in a bulk, machine-readable format, through a widely available software application,” free of charge to digital music providers, significant nonblanket licensees, authorized vendors of the above, and the Register of Copyrights; and “for a fee not to exceed the marginal cost of providing the database” to “any other person or entity. [read post]
