Search for: "English v. English" Results 5221 - 5240 of 11,201
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2015, 11:33 am by Steve Vladeck
In a ruling perhaps more noteworthy for an unusually testy exchange between two of the Justices in the majority, a five-to-four Supreme Court on Thursday sided with California in Davis v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
Simler J rejected the submission that there was no public interest in the publication of a private employment claim, relying on F v G [2012] ICR 246 at [49] to the effect that the default position in English law is and should be that it is in the public interest that the full decisions of courts and tribunals, including the names of the parties, should be published. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 7:55 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
In the case, Jimenez v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, the plaintiff was injured while running on a treadmill in one of the defendant’s gym locations. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 10:04 am by Karel Frielink
Press release In today’s Grand Chamber judgment in the case of Delfi AS v. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
English Courts and the ‘Internalisation’ of the European Convention of Human Rights? [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:34 am by Christopher Brown, Matrix
Lord Sumption, referring to Lord Hoffmann’s speech in Matadeen v Pointu [1999] 1 AC 98 and that of Baroness Hale in Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] 2 AC 557, stated that the principle of equality was “not a principle special to the jurisprudence of the European Union. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 2:44 pm
 Full details are just one McClick away, here.And while we're about it, on 17 and 18 September 2015,  the first iClic Conference takes place in sunny Southampton, down on the English South Coast. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 7:30 am by Emma Lewis, Olswang LLP
Facts JKX Oil & Gas plc is an English public company involved in the development and exploitation of oil and gas reserves in Ukraine and Russia. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 6:45 am by Dave
 It is based on a wrong reading of the Supreme Court judgment in Berrisford v Mexfield Housing Co-Operative Ltd [2011] UKSC 52 (our note here). [read post]