Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 5221 - 5240
of 15,519
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2023, 11:58 am
In Mark v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 1:46 pm
Somehow the actual damages figure doesn’t seem to be the issue for either party… Still, at least it cleared up a couple of points of law on damages for trespass. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 1:46 pm
Somehow the actual damages figure doesn’t seem to be the issue for either party… Still, at least it cleared up a couple of points of law on damages for trespass. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 4:08 pm
” The judge awarded a global general damages figure of £40,000 for libel and harassment, noting that he considered that the harassment alone would fall in the upper Vento band for distress damages arising form harassment (now £25,200–£42,000 as per the Presidential Guidance from the Employment Tribunals following De Souza v Vinci Construction (UK) Ltd [2017] EWCA Civ 879). [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 7:01 am
State v. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 4:32 am
Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 6:45 am
By Daniel RichardsonWhite and Searles v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 6:48 am
Case: CAMPINHA-BACOTE v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 1:51 pm
Cullen v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 12:00 pm
This is the second installment of our comments generated by Collins v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 5:10 pm
(Eg Walsh v Shuangyan. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 5:10 pm
(Eg Walsh v Shuangyan. [read post]
2 May 2014, 4:41 am
The guilty verdicts on counts 3 and 4 reflect that the jury determined that he subsequently figured out the transactions were fraudulent, but he continued participating. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 9:42 am
In Shah v Federbush, 2019 WL 5060496 ( S.D. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 10:54 am
HART V. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 9:54 am
In Shanahan v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 8:56 pm
Tech-Bilt, Inc. v. [read post]
31 May 2022, 5:35 am
For instance, the 2018 column stated “two years ago, I became a public figure representing domestic abuse, and I felt the full force of our culture’s wrath for women who speak out. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 6:36 am
These are not the kinds of plaintiffs that defamation law should protect, nor are the many powerful public figures and corporations that turn to this area of law to launch “SLAPPs” – strategic lawsuits against public participation – litigation designed to intimidate and bully the speaker into shutting up, and deterring others. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 3:26 am
Despite a figure in the region of £30-35 million being quoted, specific details surrounding the rebate remain unclear. [read post]
