Search for: "HARMS v. HARMS" Results 5221 - 5240 of 36,766
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2008, 5:52 pm
” The confidence in the ability to distinguish pro-competitive from anti-competitive single firm conduct in a setting that redounds with complex welfare tradeoffs, static v. dynamic efficiencies, and innovation, its remarkably different from the “first, do no harm” principles espoused in the DOJ Report. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 1:45 am by INFORRM
However, Warby J accepted that it was impossible in fact to treat those election results as any evidence of a lack of harm to reputation, particularly given that many voters vote for the Party rather than the candidate. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 6:42 am
  The lawsuit comes on the year anniversary of the Supreme Court ruling on Massachusetts v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 5:13 am
The RRT proved willing to accept that treatment of this kind was not contingent upon formal criminalisation, as in 1200247 [2012] at [158]:[T]he Tribunal accepts that the negative attitude of the general public towards homosexuals is still reflected in the police force and in other state agencies, as well as in government itself, and that private persecution of homosexuals could be condoned by the police such that it takes on an official quality.In 1414394 [2016], the only published decision since… [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 5:13 am
The RRT proved willing to accept that treatment of this kind was not contingent upon formal criminalisation, as in 1200247 [2012] at [158]:[T]he Tribunal accepts that the negative attitude of the general public towards homosexuals is still reflected in the police force and in other state agencies, as well as in government itself, and that private persecution of homosexuals could be condoned by the police such that it takes on an official quality.In 1414394 [2016], the only published decision since… [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 11:33 am by Mack Sperling
It's not every day that you see a "mandatory injunction,"  In fact, Judge Jolly said last Friday that such an injunction was "rare and generally disfavored as an interlocutory remedy," in Bayer Cropscience LP v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 11:33 am by Mack Sperling
It's not every day that you see a "mandatory injunction,"  In fact, Judge Jolly said last Friday that such an injunction was "rare and generally disfavored as an interlocutory remedy," in Bayer Cropscience LP v. [read post]