Search for: "He v. Holder"
Results 5221 - 5240
of 5,733
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2009, 10:09 pm
Does the fact of Walker’s false statement that he was Hindle and the holder of a subsisting driver’s licence, accompanied by the forgery of Hindle’s name, vitiate the consent that was in fact given? [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 5:20 pm
Bose Corp. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 12:01 pm
Why let another potential tortfeasor into the account without the express consent of all holders? [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 7:14 am
See Raskin v. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 12:06 pm
See generally Eldred v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 2:52 pm
., v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
In JAKKS Pacific, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 1:59 pm
Coburn Group, LLC v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 11:44 am
Peter Shipley is a Bay Area hacker and patent-holder who sues technology companies under the corporate name Enhanced Security Research, LLC. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 3:26 pm
He must belong to the judicial service which as a class is free form executive-control and is disciplined to uphold the dignity, integrity and independence of judiciary. ....It is clear that the expression "judicial office" under Article 217(2)(a) of the Constitution has to be interpreted in consonance with the scheme of Chapter V and VI of Part VI of the Constitution. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 12:00 am
For instance, in Centrafam v Sterling case [(1976) F.S.R. 164], the real beneficiary was the parallel importer who sold the drug nalidixic acid (Negram) twice the price in England, not the final consumer or the patent holder. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 12:39 pm
In Fedsure Life Assurance Ltd v Greater Johannesburg Transitional Metropolitan Council, the principle of legality was held to mean that a body exercising public power is required to act within the powers lawfully given to it, and in President of the Republic of South Africa v South African Rugby Football Union, the principle necessitated that the holder of the public power must act in good faith and not misconstrue his powers. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 1:47 am
He found no such issue in prong four of the eBay test. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 1:47 am
He found no such issue in prong four of the eBay test. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 1:47 am
He found no such issue in prong four of the eBay test. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 2:02 pm
Rights of Preferred v. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 5:00 am
S'holders Litig., 2009 Del. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 5:13 pm
Happily for anyone who wants to free Willie, however, the Supreme Court has cut through that Gordian knot of liability.The Supreme Court held in Dastar Corp. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 1:31 pm
Ruling in M.H. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 5:00 am
Seemingly unimpressed by equity’s deterrent force, he delivered a notice of merger that was a virtual guarantee of litigation (assuming, that is, that the minority fund it -- was that the bet, especially since institutional holders were likely few?) [read post]
