Search for: "House v. House"
Results 5221 - 5240
of 41,226
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2014, 8:19 am
Khan; AC35070 - Konover Residential Corp. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 2:41 am
In related news, on Tuesday 26 March 2013, the House of Lords will consider amendments to the Justice and Security Bill, concerning closed material proceedings, made by the House of Commons. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
Mitu v London Borough of Camden [2011] EWCA civ 1249In which the Court of Appeal splits over the proper interpretation of Regulation 8(2) of The Allocation of Housing and Homelessness (Review Procedures) Regulations 1999, while agreeing on the outcome in this case. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
Mitu v London Borough of Camden [2011] EWCA civ 1249In which the Court of Appeal splits over the proper interpretation of Regulation 8(2) of The Allocation of Housing and Homelessness (Review Procedures) Regulations 1999, while agreeing on the outcome in this case. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 5:10 pm
In fact, they do not reside in that house at all, but in a separate house a few blocks away. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 4:58 am
New England In-House has an article on LG v. [read post]
29 Sep 2007, 1:08 pm
The Intent Use of Protected Speech or Activity As Evidence Does Not Mean that a Cause of Action is a SLAPP Cause of ActionDepartment of Fair Employment & Housing v. 1105 Alta Loma Road Apartments, LLC (Sept. 5, 2007, B194891, Second District)18 p. opinionAn action is a SLAPP action only if it is based on the defendant's protected free speech or petitioning activity. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 5:24 am
As a reminder, in case one were needed, that undertakings to the Court in ASB cases should be considered very carefully indeed comes Circle 33 Housing Trust Limited v Kathirkmanathan (2009) CA (Civ Div) 16/7/2009 [Not on Bailii yet, available as note on lawtel]. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 1:04 pm
The case is State v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 5:56 am
Only tangentially relevant to housing law, but R v Charles [2009] EWCA Crim 1570 is a decision of the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) dealing with the question of burden of proof for a “reasonable excuse” defence when charged with breaching an ASBO. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 4:03 pm
Ricky Edwards-Tubb v JD Wetherspoon plc [2011] EWCA Civ 136 Another brief note to mention this case which, despite not being housing-related in any way, is important in any matter where an expert is to be instructed. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 3:13 pm
On October 18, 1972, in the Senate debate concerning the Noise Control Act of 1972, then-Senator John V. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 10:53 am
Craftrule Ltd v 41-60 Albert Palace Mansions (Freehold) Ltd [2010] EWHC 1230 (Ch) is the first higher court decision on the meaning of "self-contained part of a building" in the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 9:42 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in Cheeks v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 4:03 pm
Ricky Edwards-Tubb v JD Wetherspoon plc [2011] EWCA Civ 136 Another brief note to mention this case which, despite not being housing-related in any way, is important in any matter where an expert is to be instructed. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 12:43 am
PDLL v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 2:57 am
This morning the House of Lords, looking slightly unfamiliar without Lord Hoffmann in the line-up, gave its decision in Generics (UK) Limited and others v H Lundbeck A/S [2009] UKHL 12, dismissing Generics' appeal against the much-discussed decision of the Court of Appeal (equally unfamiliar with Lord Hofffmann in the starring role) on the application of the concept of "insufficiency" to the validity of a granted patent.In short, their Lordships -- with Lords Scott,… [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 10:53 am
Craftrule Ltd v 41-60 Albert Palace Mansions (Freehold) Ltd [2010] EWHC 1230 (Ch) is the first higher court decision on the meaning of "self-contained part of a building" in the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 6:07 am
Davis, ABA Journal] Obama plan for mass refinance overriding terms of mortgages “could permanently drive housing finance costs higher” [James Pethokoukis] In Sackett v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 1:40 pm
The bill overturns Ledbetter v. [read post]
