Search for: "Individual Does 1-10" Results 5221 - 5240 of 14,841
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am by chief
Section 105(1): In this Act- … "child" means, subject to paragraph 16 of Schedule 1, a person under the age of eighteen Note that paragraph 16 of Schedule 1 does not apply in this case. 'Child' or 'Child in Need'? [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am by chief
Section 105(1): In this Act- … "child" means, subject to paragraph 16 of Schedule 1, a person under the age of eighteen Note that paragraph 16 of Schedule 1 does not apply in this case. 'Child' or 'Child in Need'? [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 10:40 am by Chinmayi Sharma
It includes several statements by defendants and other individuals related to the campaign denying involvement in any election-tampering scheme. [read post]
29 Aug 2015, 10:58 am by Drew Falkenstein
  [1, 15, 33] CDC statistics show that food is the most common vehicle of transmission for noroviruses; of 232 outbreaks of norovirus between July 1997 and June 2000, 57% were foodborne, 16% were spread from person-to-person, and 3% were waterborne. [6, 31] When food is the vehicle of transmission, contamination occurs most often through a food handler improperly handling a food directly before it is eaten. [4, 9, 10] Infected individuals shed the virus in large… [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 6:44 pm by Bill Marler
  [1, 15, 33] CDC statistics show that food is the most common vehicle of transmission for noroviruses; of 232 outbreaks of norovirus between July 1997 and June 2000, 57% were foodborne, 16% were spread from person-to-person, and 3% were waterborne. [6, 31] When food is the vehicle of transmission, contamination occurs most often through a food handler improperly handling a food directly before it is eaten. [4, 9, 10] Infected individuals shed the virus in large… [read post]
11 Feb 2023, 8:13 pm by Bill Marler
  [1, 15, 33] CDC statistics show that food is the most common vehicle of transmission for noroviruses; of 232 outbreaks of norovirus between July 1997 and June 2000, 57% were foodborne, 16% were spread from person-to-person, and 3% were waterborne. [6, 31] When food is the vehicle of transmission, contamination occurs most often through a food handler improperly handling a food directly before it is eaten. [4, 9, 10]   Infected individuals shed the virus… [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 2:59 pm by Eugene Volokh
R. 27-10(b)) the September 1 decision that provisionally sealed the briefs until the merits panel is assigned. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 2:36 am by Thorsten Bausch (Hoffmann Eitle)
However, analysing decisions T 812/09, T 2273/10, T 2237/10 and T 27/16, the Board notes that the jurisdiction is not consistent in cases where the amendments are based on selections from lists of converging alternatives, which leads them to the following questions (see item 1.7 of the decision): 1) Should the selection of elements from lists of converging alternatives be treated in the same way as the selection of elements from lists of non-converging alternatives? [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 1:03 pm by Kara OBrien
Resp., Op. 2002-07 (May 29, 2002) (commenting that many lawyers have noted that applying the ethical rules to an ancillary business can affect the viability of the business). [9] ABA, Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 5.7. [10] Id., Rule 5.7, cmt. 1. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
Cas. at 26.In his opening brief, Donald Trump appeared to preserve this argument, though just barely:  He didn’t devote any space to it.[1]  His reply brief does even less with it than that, offering only the ambiguous sentence “that section 3 may be enforced only though the congressionally enacted methods of enforcement,” without even arguing that Chief Justice Chase got it right in Griffin’s Case. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 10:05 am by Colby Pastre
As a result, the Wayfair decision opened the way for other states to begin similar tax collection on out-of-state sales.[2] However, this ruling does not give states carte blanche in constructing and enforcing these collections. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
This section does not provide a truly useful example of how to proceed within the framework of the outlined method. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 1:50 am by Kevin Kaufman
Ranks for Missouri and Neighboring States   Rank State New Mature Missouri 10 18 Arkansas 16 33 Illinois 20 46 Iowa 44 42 Kansas 30 50 Kentucky 13 15 Nebraska 9 9 Oklahoma 1 10 Tennessee 15 8 Source: Tax Foundation, Location Matters. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 4:37 am
No certificate shall be held to be complete and correct that does not supply all items of information called for in this section and in KRS 213.051, or satisfactorily account for their omission except as provided in KRS 199.570(3). [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 9:12 am by Michael Madison
” – was my topic at an earlier blog, Pittsblog, for nearly 10 years (2003-2011). [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 2:54 am by INFORRM
In other words, the European Court left the question open as to whether defamation laws that seek to protect the reputation of a deceased individual per se can amount to legitimate restrictions under Article 10(2) of the Convention. [read post]