Search for: "M. J." Results 5221 - 5240 of 22,075
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Canada  In the case of Huff v Zuk, 2019 ABQB 691 K D Nixon J awarded the plaintiff defamation damages of $50,000 in action between two dentists. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
Il est déjà morcelé par les décisions du TAT relatives aux services essentiels. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
He frames his entire campaign around the idea that Trump uniquely threatens America’s democracy and even decency—a claim that happens to be terrifyingly true yet ignores what the Republican Party has become over the past generation, Trump or no Trump.The Biden message is: Pick me, I’m okay. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 11:06 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
En particulier, la figure 2 du document D1 (page 318) est reproduite dans le mémoire du recours et comprend les signes de référence de la revendication 1 (voir la figure reproduite ci-dessous).FORMULE/TABLEAU/GRAPHIQUELa combinaison des documents D1 et D3 par rapport à la revendication 1 a déjà été exposée dans le mémoire d'opposition du 16 août 2010, voir le troisième paragraphe… [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 3:54 pm by AntoineBourgetRousseau
Ainsi, ce dernier ne pourra pas être écarté à moins d’une exception déjà reconnue, et non selon la discrétion du TAT. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 11:30 am by D Daniel Sokol
Oliver J Bethell, Gavin N Baird, Alexander M Waksman suggest Ensuring innovation through participative antitrust. [read post]
21 Sep 2019, 4:03 pm by Howard Knopf
"Deliverance" by John Boorman 1972Here’s a summer’s end snapshot about the state of copyright in Canada in 2019 as we:Digest two contrasting and competing parliamentary committee reports;Await the ruling, which could come at any time now, of the Federal Court of Appeal (“FCA”) in the Access Copyright v. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 9:30 pm by ernst
Butler (The Ohio State University) on priests claiming sanctuary and serfs vs. slaves in medieval England, Krista J. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 9:56 am by Eugene Volokh
Circuit decision, which the IRS has since adopted into its regulations).[13] I'm not certain this is so; I think the Supreme Court may well conclude that this so-called "methodology" standard, like the "sufficiently full and fair exposition" standard, is so subjective as to provide too much room for deliberate or subconscious viewpoint discrimination.[14] But even if such a "methodology" test is sufficiently clear to be constitutional, it must be applied… [read post]