Search for: "MAY v. US " Results 5221 - 5240 of 120,406
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2022, 6:58 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch On October 12, 2022, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the fair use copyright case of Andy Warhol Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
 In an adjudication published on 10 May 2011 the PCC noted that it had “consistently ruled that so-called ˜fishing expeditions’ – where newspapers employ subterfuge and use clandestine devices without sufficient justification – are unacceptable”. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 10:36 am
 He says:"Those of us who have not been convicted of a crime are not required to attend Alcoholics Anonymous meetings or keep some probation office advised of our address, we may own firearms if we choose, and we can go to a restaurant even if we know that servers or other customers may be drug users. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:01 am by gmlevine
In cases where the domain name comprises a trademark without any modifier, “the degree of initial interest confusion on the part of an Internet user may well be such that it would not be legitimate for the domain name to be used for a criticism site,” citing Covance, Inc v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 12:19 am
Certain information contained in personnel records may be redacted in complying with a Freedom of Information requestMatter of Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. v City of Albany, 63 AD3d 1336The Albany Times Union [TU] reporter filed two requests under the Freedom of Information Law (Public Officers Law Article 6) with City of Albany seeking documents, including “gun tags,” related to the alleged use of official Albany Police Department channels to… [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 7:20 am
In many cases people do this without really understanding the consequences of what they are doing.The problems of using joint tenancies with children are again illustrated in a recent British Columbia case, Turner v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 8:18 am
It may therefore be that if a solicitor had to [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
According to the majority, California law did not support Newdow’s contention that he had a right to dictate to others what they may and may not say to his child respecting religion, noting that he sought to “forestall his daughter’s exposure to religious ideas that her mother, who wields a form of veto power, endorses, and to use his parental status to challenge the influences to which his daughter may be exposed in school when he and Banning… [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:43 am by Stephanie Smith, Arden Chambers.
The Court of Appeal decision The Court of Appeal reviewed a number of authorities on the meaning of “house”, including Lake v Bennett [1970] 1 Q.B. 663, Tandon v Trustees of Spurgeons Homes [1982] A.C. 755, Boss Holdings Ltd v Grosvenor West End Properties Ltd [2008] 1 W.L.R. 289, (where the House of Lords held that, when deciding whether a building had been designed or adapted for living in, one is largely concerned with the physical state of the property) and… [read post]