Search for: "Mark C. Good"
Results 5221 - 5240
of 5,884
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2009, 4:07 am
[End session notes] [Begin comments] Unfortunately, I had to leave at the half-way mark. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 1:07 pm
Get your vitamins: • Vitamin C. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 7:16 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: District Court W D Washington re-affirms that first sale doctrine can apply to “licensed” software: Vernor v Autodesk (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (Technology & Marketing) (Ars Technica) (Spicy IP) Australian ISP in court for not disconnecting users: AFACT v iiNet (Ars Technica) (TorrentFreak) (TorrentFreak)… [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 11:37 am
With best wishes Sincerely, /s/ Bob Robert C. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 6:55 am
My problem is that Nesson is Tenenbaum’s lawyer and he hasn’t given me a good reason to believe he can get Tenenbaum free from that monumental verdict. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 7:48 pm
Looking good is feeling good with the help of estheticians, massage therapists, surgeons, stylists and technicians. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 7:48 pm
Looking good is feeling good with the help of estheticians, massage therapists, surgeons, stylists and technicians. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 2:30 pm
Mark Rea, Director. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 11:01 pm
And I’m not even suggesting the median is a good target. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 4:45 am
's marks would not be seen as denoting trade origin of the goods covered, such as jewellery, clothing and fashion accessories. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 9:19 am
This proposal also is good news for applicants, as a fear of reprimand on behalf of examiners if a questionable case is issued is believed to be a cause for the drastic drop in the patent allowance rate at the USPTO.I expect these proposals will be subject to at least minor tweaks as interested stakeholders (including the examining corps) offer their input. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 9:46 pm
As an advocate for clients, family lawyers are often accused of standing on toes, or at times of making unnecessarily provocative statements in letters or court submissions. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 12:45 am
Consequently, physical limitations that still exist beyond the one-year mark are more probably than not permanent. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 2:13 pm
The three cases encompassed by today's opinion are: Google France v Louis Vuitton, Google v CNHRR and Google v Viaticum Luteceil, (Joined Cases C-236/08, C-237/08 and C-238/08). [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Skelos, et al., Respondents, vDavid Paterson, & c., et al., Appellants. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 9:00 am
We have a nice student post today on the motion filed by Mark Cuban for attorneys fees against the Commission alleging bad faith in connection with the investigation. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 3:59 am
Such a use cannot therefore be considered as being a use made in relation to goods or services identical or similar to those covered by the trade marks [even if it affects the mark's essential function or damages its goodwill? [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 10:17 pm
"Opposer's mark is COTT, while applicant's mark depicts CO in large letters, with the word tea, the flavor and major ingredient of the goods, written in smaller letters below it. [read post]
