Search for: "Marshall v. Marshall" Results 5221 - 5240 of 6,382
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
That three-Justice opinion (written by Justice Brennan and joined by Justices Marshall and Stevens) stressed that the tax exemption was not a permissible accommodation of religion, because it "burdens nonbeneficiaries markedly"[14] "by increasing their tax bills by whatever amount is needed to offset the benefit bestowed on subscribers to religious publications. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:19 am by Charles Fried
Ogden Chief Justice Marshall had written that the Clause empowered Congress to lay down the rule by which commerce (not persons in commerce) could be regulated. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 8:57 am by Venkat Balasubramani
The court goes into some detail on this point, but in the end, so long as the legal issue is evaluated subjectively, it’s unclear how a 512(f) plaintiff can marshal sufficient evidence to counteract a defendant’s self-serving representation that they believed the noticed activity is infringement. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:29 am by David Fraser
On this particular question, the Chief Justice’s judgement in Grant v. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Forty-five years ago, the baseball world trained its attention on the Wisconsin Supreme Court and its impending decision in the case of Wisconsin v. [read post]