Search for: "May v. State"
Results 5221 - 5240
of 119,555
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2018, 7:19 am
Here are the materials in United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 11:28 pm
The status of the individual performing services for a public employer may be critical in determining liabilityCzark v Hauppauge UFSD, NYS Supreme Court, [Not selected for publication in the Official Reports]The Czark case illustrates that the status of the individual performing services for a public employer may be critical in determining whether or not the public employer will be held liable for an injury to an individual.A Hauppauge Union Free School District student… [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 6:50 am
In United States v. [read post]
15 May 2011, 9:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 2:20 pm
Bourne Co. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 2:57 pm
If signed by the Governor, this legislation would codify the 2008 California Supreme Court decision in Edwards v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 9:57 am
In Cosmetic Warriors v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 8:47 am
See, also, Antinore v State, 40 NY2d 6]. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
SEIU appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.Citing Matter of Taylor v Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 182 AD3d 815 and Matter of Ortiz v Simmons, 67 AD3d 1208, the Appellate Division, noting that one of SEIU's members involved in the instant litigation had retired from the Fire Department, explained "so much of the second amended petition/complaint as was asserted by him is not academic, as the determination that there was sufficient… [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
SEIU appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.Citing Matter of Taylor v Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 182 AD3d 815 and Matter of Ortiz v Simmons, 67 AD3d 1208, the Appellate Division, noting that one of SEIU's members involved in the instant litigation had retired from the Fire Department, explained "so much of the second amended petition/complaint as was asserted by him is not academic, as the determination that there was sufficient… [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 11:18 am
May 11, 2011). [read post]
12 May 2020, 11:41 am
Among his numerous successes is the $570M breach of contract and patent infringement verdict for his client in Medtronic v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 2:26 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Doyle & Ors v R [2012] EWCA Crim 995 (16 May 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Rehill v Rider Holdings Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 628 (16 May 2012) Sulamerica CIA Nacional De Seguros SA & Ors v Enesa Engenharia SA & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 638 (16 May 2012) Sucafina SA v Rotenberg [2012] EWCA Civ 637 (16 May 2012) JSC BTA Bank v Ablyazov [2012] EWCA Civ 639 (16 May… [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 5:27 am
Given the national security issues, the Court considered such an approach would be wrong in principle and may set a dangerous precedent. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 1:34 pm
Sure, federal courts scholars may on occasion go ballistic, but rarely do you see actual judges wax poetic about the need for one or more of these doctrines to be modified in light of patently inefficient federal duplication of state court litigation.But it happens. [read post]
5 Jan 2007, 7:01 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 3:56 pm
Covid-19 Pandemic Class Action Lawsuit Statistics - Wage and Hour Class Actions Most Common Covid Case of The Week - Wage and Hour Claims Added to Retaliation Claim - Aguayo v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 4:50 am
State v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 8:00 am
Aryeh v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 8:55 am
(SFFA) v. [read post]
