Search for: "Paras v. State" Results 5221 - 5240 of 6,122
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2010, 10:16 pm by Rosalind English
Application by his dependants for entry clearance was refused by the ECO because the appellants could not fulfil the accommodation and maintenance requirements imposed by sub-paras (iv) and (v) of paras 281 and 297. [read post]
12 May 2010, 1:04 pm by Berin Szoka
  With approximately 80 million broadband connections in the United States, that’s a cool $7.2 billion in new funds available to USF—instantly nearly doubling its size to over $16 billion a year. [read post]
12 May 2010, 10:21 am by NL
The Ahmeds approached Mr Murphy in July 2008, stating that they wished to undertake extensive works of repair and refurbishment. [read post]
12 May 2010, 10:21 am by NL
The Ahmeds approached Mr Murphy in July 2008, stating that they wished to undertake extensive works of repair and refurbishment. [read post]
10 May 2010, 6:30 am by INFORRM
  This recommendation is not legally binding on Member States. [read post]
9 May 2010, 11:54 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
Dardi, J. applied the principle in Glover v. [read post]
9 May 2010, 3:06 am by Adam Wagner
For example, in Georgian Labour Party v Georgia, at para 155 the Court said: The Court does not rule out that the applicant party, as a legal entity (see Russian Conservative Party of Entrepreneurs and Others, cited above, § 102, and Kommersant Moldovy v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 5:17 pm by INFORRM
  In XYZ v Victoria Police ([2010] VCAT 255 para 558) after full consideration of the international cases and textbooks, the judge held that The right to freedom of expression is foundational to democracy, the rule of law, and individual, social and cultural development. [read post]
5 May 2010, 2:49 pm
(In re Tamoxifen Citrate Antitrust Litig.), 2006-2 Trade Cases 75,382. [read post]