Search for: "Powers v. Powers" Results 5221 - 5240 of 55,708
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2014, 4:21 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
This was the power used in Whiston and, unlike the s 254 power of recall, it is not open to review by the Parole Board or other judicial body. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 6:38 am
 Further, although no law explicitly permits unincorporated associations to enter into contracts, the Court indicated that this is a long-recognized and uncontroversial power (see Miller v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 12:02 am
Moreover, the District Court found that the Supreme Court's decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 1:58 pm by Eugene Volokh
The court's decision was simply that Congress lacked the enumerated power to regulate this behavior at all, and that dealing with such behavior should be left to the states (as with other noncommercial intrastate misbehavior, for instance the violence against women discussed in U.S. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 1:58 pm by Eugene Volokh
The court's decision was simply that Congress lacked the enumerated power to regulate this behavior at all, and that dealing with such behavior should be left to the states (as with other noncommercial intrastate misbehavior, for instance the violence against women discussed in U.S. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 4:50 am by tracey
The Upper Tribunal had a broad discretion with regard to the control of the evidence before it and had, within its case management powers, the power to waive non-compliance with a practice direction or a rule. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 4:24 pm
The 9th also found no separation of powers issue in the PROTECT Act in giving the power to move for the third point to the government.U.S. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 9:50 pm
” Since the Uighurs “may be lawfully detained incident to that distinct power,” and since they “do not wish to be released in any country that is currently willing to admit them, there is no basis under [the Supreme Court’s June 12 decision in] Boumediene [v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 9:11 am by Michael Steven Green
So far, I have said nothing about the so-called “twin aims of the Erie rule” in Hanna v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 11:17 am by Ken Lammers
The Judge in Loudon County mistakes the meaning and scope of Nelson v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 10:57 am by Mark Weidemaier
Here’s a recent case by the Maryland Court of Appeals, Cain v Midland Funding, which falls into the latter camp. [read post]
1 May 2007, 11:58 am
The filings were in response to an application (Zalita v. [read post]