Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF S M"
Results 5221 - 5240
of 33,803
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2007, 5:00 am
"I'm absolutely delighted. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 1:54 pm
Due to shipping considerations, only United States addresses, please. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm
” Even under such authority, the Secretary cannot base exclusion upon the alien’s “past, current, or expected beliefs, statements, or associations … [that] would be lawful within the United States,” unless “the Secretary of State personally determines that the alien’s admission would compromise a compelling United States foreign policy interest. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 4:20 am
I'm sorry I'm having trouble understanding that. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 6:59 pm
TR is bound to face some interesting challenges and discussions when they make this pitch. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 12:15 pm
In the matter of Paul M. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 3:45 am
 And, of course, I'm always interesting in drawing inferences about readers from the books they own and use. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 1:42 pm
I got interested in the legal issues involved in web scraping, and so I put together a hypothetical to test some of them out. [read post]
11 May 2015, 10:02 pm
Paul Lombardo of Georgia State Law School is one of my personal heroes, for everything he's done to promote the public memory of Buck v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 10:54 am
Re & Christopher M. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 8:42 am
Not long ago, the Houston Chronicle wrote an interesting article about "road rage" and its prevalence in the Houston area. [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 11:14 am
Chief Justice John Roberts took umbrage at the President's criticism during his State of the Union address. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 9:51 am
Anthony M. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 2:44 am
See Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m). [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 10:22 am
I am admitted to the New York State Bar. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 6:00 am
Keith M. [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:04 am
Following on Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 [Our report] and Lord Jackson’s view on JR costs, the Court of Appeal in M v London Borough of Croydon [2012] EWCA Civ 595 has given general guidance for awarding costs. [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:04 am
Following on Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 [Our report] and Lord Jackson’s view on JR costs, the Court of Appeal in M v London Borough of Croydon [2012] EWCA Civ 595 has given general guidance for awarding costs. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
Article by Lance McMillian; response by Judy M. [read post]
18 Jan 2009, 10:20 pm
Bartrum, Of Historiography and Constitutional Principle: Jefferson's Reply to the Danbury Baptists, (Journal of Church and State, Vol. 51, Spring 2008). [read post]
