Search for: "State v. Branch"
Results 5221 - 5240
of 7,036
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2020, 4:02 am
In the 1968 case Pickering v. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 5:23 am
” This might seem fairly obvious to some, as this is what people think the courts’ job would be, but in 1984, the Supreme Court ruled in Chevron v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 11:06 am
For example, in Cohen v. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 6:55 pm
" Apparently, the only judicial decision on the meaning of "part or parts" in the FFA was United States v. [read post]
2 May 2007, 2:06 am
Annual salaries of state-paid judges and justices of the 5 unified court system. [read post]
26 Jan 2025, 2:53 pm
Caleb Nelson, Adjudication in the Political Branches, 107 Colum. [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:08 am
Congress enacted the CRA in response to the United States Supreme Court decision, in INS v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 8:20 am
Guantanamo detainees do not have rights under either of those provisions, the panel majority concluded in Kiyemba, et al., v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
As stated in Lavigne v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 8:17 am
In McGrain v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 1:03 pm
United States, 530 US 428 (2000). [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:47 am
Title V/CSHCN has supported care notebooks for families and hired parent advocates around the state. [read post]
11 May 2010, 11:01 am
GRAHAM: And it should have an independent judiciary involved in making that decision beyond the executive branch. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 4:29 am
Tyrrell and Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 4:49 am
[v] The Vanishing Criminal Jury Trial at 25-29. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 2:58 pm
The Supreme Court has developed this concept further since Youngstown; the most frequently cited case is Dames & Moore v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 7:45 am
As stated, the rules require one intending to apply for asylum to first obtain an appointment. [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:08 pm
The Human Rights Policy cites R. v. [read post]
