Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 5221 - 5240
of 9,114
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
Donald 14-618Issue: (1) Whether the Michigan courts' decision not to extend United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 5:52 am
Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945)), and pre-Bauman – thus constitutionally suspect – Delaware state decisions, the district court concluded that personal jurisdiction could lie on the basis of “consent. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 9:25 am
District Court for the Northern District of Indiana upheld an IDEA hearing officer's dismissal with prejudice of a due process hearing complaint. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 6:49 am
State v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 7:46 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 7:23 pm
Michael Greve on Halbig and its aftermath Oklahoma district court rejects IRS tax credit rule — a discussion of the second judicial decision against the administration’s position. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 11:19 am
In a 46-page majority opinion written by Justice Chin and joined by four other justices, punctuated by an 18-page concurring opinion (by Justice Liu, joined by Justice Werdegar) which reads like a dissent, the California Supreme Court reversed the First District Court of Appeal’s judgment in Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 6:48 pm
It was in that context that Carswell, J., stated: Therefore, section 211 of the Surrogate's Court Act is not applicable to or binding upon the United States. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 5:08 pm
On March 10, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of Adam Stewart v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 3:31 pm
CREED-21 v. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 6:48 pm
[emphasis added] Other American decisions in Vernonia School District 47J v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 2:08 pm
Even statements that at first blush appear to be factual are protected by the First Amendment if they cannot reasonably be interpreted as stating actual facts about their target. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 2:08 pm
Even statements that at first blush appear to be factual are protected by the First Amendment if they cannot reasonably be interpreted as stating actual facts about their target. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 9:21 am
These timing issues are at the core of the discussion in a recent decision from Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeal, Hankerson v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 7:23 am
In Henderson v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm
Under the Supreme Court’s 1985 ruling in Heckler v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 3:38 pm
It was moved to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation because of ongoing multidistrict litigation there concerning Lexapro. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 12:26 pm
Finding that the plaintiffs failed to state a claim of NLRA preemption, a federal district court in Minnesota ruled in Greene v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 7:29 am
P. 12(b)(6), which was granted by the district court. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 4:14 pm
“The Book” is the most widely used and judicially recognized real estate treatise in California and is cited by practicing attorneys and courts throughout the state. [read post]
