Search for: "State v. Grow" Results 5221 - 5240 of 7,630
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2011, 6:43 am by Stephen Albainy-Jenei
District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, and the Illinois state courts. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 2:49 pm
56/11 Raiffeisen Waren-Zentrale Rhein-Main eG v Saatgut-Treuhandverwaltungs GmbH. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 2:52 pm
56/11 Raiffeisen Waren-Zentrale Rhein-Main eG v Saatgut-Treuhandverwaltungs GmbH. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 9:36 am by Sherri Johnson
   The seminal case dealing with application of the actual use doctrine to exempt entities is the Supreme Court of Florida’s decision in Dade County Taxing Authorities v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 6:12 am by Clarence T.
”  The DEA further divides paraphernalia into two categories: (1) user-specific products designed to assist in using or concealing drugs, such as pipes, smoking masks, bongs, cocaine freebase kits, marijuana grow kits, roach clips, and items such as hollowed out cosmetic cases or fake pagers andcell phones used to conceal illegal drugs, and (2) dealer-specific products (scales, baggies, etc.) designed to assist in distributing drugs. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm by Geoffrey Rapp
Gillies, Comment, Not with a bang, but a whimper: Congress’s proposal to overturn the Supreme Court’s Leegin decision with the Discount Pricing Consumer Protection Act of 2009, 18 VILLANOVA SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT LAW JOURNAL 645 (2011)Nathaniel Grow, Louisville v. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 1:18 pm by Jon
(Actually, he overlooked military crimes, but those only applied to military and militia when in federal service, and were a kind of private law.)However, in United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 7:30 am by Tess Bridgeman
The United States avoided a ruling on the merits of this issue in Doe v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
Red terror pushed the legitimised violence of the new state to the extremes. [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
It is clear that politics in the United States frequently depart from norms of comity and respect. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(Afro-IP)   Spain Trade mark cancellation and damages: a matter of (bad) faith (Class 46)   United Kingdom EWHC (Pat): No ruling on hypothetical issue: MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (PatLit) EWHC: Trial judge says ‘Boileau’ to patent licence; appeal court agrees: Oxonica Energy Ltd v Neuftec… [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 10:32 am by Steven Boutwell
This was the issue presented to the Louisiana Supreme Court in the case, Sullivan v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 2:57 am by Ilya Somin
Hardwick helped set the stage for Lawrence v. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 4:00 pm by James Romoser
In his majority opinion in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]