Search for: "State v. So"
Results 5221 - 5240
of 117,809
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2018, 8:52 am
It will require the judgment creditor to show a good arguable case that a third party has unlawfully agreed to assist the judgment debtor in doing so. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 8:04 am
So, with apologies to any readers who may have been awaiting it with bated [please note correct spelling] breath, here's the story.The judgment referred to above is that of the Second Chamber of the Court of Justice the European Union (CJEU) in Case C‑98/13, Martin Blomqvist v Rolex SA, Manufacture des Montres Rolex SA, a request for a preliminary ruling from the Højesteret (Supreme Court), Denmark [a big Katpat to the CJEU, in dispensing with an… [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 7:25 am
Club's music Is OK for humans but too loud for fish, or so saith a county government in Sweden. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 7:27 am
The appellant argued that the VAT was a mandatory inclusion in his price which was state imposed and therefore he was collecting on behalf of the state. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 2:47 am
U.S. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 5:00 am
Residents, Guardians and involved family members should get familiar with these new directive so as to speak up and protect these privacy rights. [read post]
2 May 2019, 3:10 pm
Heather’s Legal Summaries: R v Trinchi, 2019 ONCA 356 R v Trinchi is the most recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision in a string of cases related to the offence of voyeurism under s. 162(1) of the Criminal Code (see our previous post on the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in R v Jarvis). [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
The State relied upon cases upholding the use of RADAR, which was different than LIDAR. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 12:37 pm
United States, so narrowly that it wrote a ticket that is good for the Moore's train only and not for almost any future trains. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 10:05 am
Microsoft v. [read post]
7 May 2013, 9:00 am
Yesterday we looked at a California federal court decision in Martensen v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 9:35 am
Richard began by stating that he does not believe the case has changed the law. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 8:25 pm
May v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 6:30 pm
Neither did the client's local Alabama attorney, so the filing date for a Notice of Appeal just passed by. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 5:00 am
While the Secretary of State’s decision could be judicially reviewable, it would not be appropriate for a national court to substitute its own assessment for the decision of the member states which constituted the committee. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:01 pm
So the court had to move on to implied preemption, where the question is whether the claim is “based in traditional state tort law. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
So is Bruce Ackerman’s dualist theory. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 7:07 am
Not so fast, the Supreme Court says.The case is Grady v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 7:36 am
Obama v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:08 am
But, even so, Texas does have a few state anti-retaliation statutes. [read post]
