Search for: "State v. Square"
Results 5221 - 5240
of 6,571
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2011, 11:21 pm
The case of Patmainiece v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions was reported in an earlier post. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 4:32 pm
Bruce V. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 2:21 pm
” [1] Zubulake v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 10:57 am
Today, March 24, is the centennial of the date on which the New York Court of Appeals issued its opinion in Ives v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 8:58 pm
In People v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:21 am
” The inaccuracy of that contention is once again squarely demonstrated in a recent Massachusetts Superior Court decision: Zona Corp. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:43 am
Lumba (WL) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 12 (23 March 2011) – Read judgment / press summary The Supreme Court has ruled that it was unlawful and a “serious abuse of power” for the Home Office to follow an unpublished policy on the detention of foreign national prisoners which contradicted its published policy. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 11:35 am
Orcutt’s First Law states that “Before things get better, they must get much worse. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 11:40 pm
A-S v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 564 (Admin) (17 January 2011): Bizarre “catch-22? [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 10:25 am
AOL squarely addressed this issue as well]. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 8:39 am
Morales v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 6:19 am
Keurig, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 6:02 pm
In a recent ruling entitled Salomaa v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 5:01 am
Mitchell vs Illinois State Police/State of Illinois, Case #10 WC 35184. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:26 am
Patmalniece (FC) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Respondent) [2011] UKSC 11 – Read judgment / press summary The Supreme Court has ruled that pensioners from other European Union states should not have the right to claim pension credits in the UK. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 1:35 pm
[2] See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 10:40 am
Sorrel v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 10:17 am
Sher v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 2:29 pm
One saw something of this line of reasoning in the following comment on a Catholic blog: “It was intended to state an opinion that hurt people. [read post]
