Search for: "U.S. v. STATE OF TEXAS"
Results 5221 - 5240
of 8,606
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2023, 12:04 pm
Paxton and Moody v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 12:48 pm
John Cornyn (R-Tex.) and served as Texas solicitor general. [read post]
10 May 2011, 3:57 pm
Chamber of Commerce and the Competitive Enterprise Institute but also three states (Texas, Alabama and Montana). [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 1:10 am
Texas five years after the decision. [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:02 pm
Georgia Shelby Bell, University of Minnesota: The Presidency as a Tool for Foreign Policy: An Exploration of the Implications of United States v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:02 pm
Georgia Shelby Bell, University of Minnesota: The Presidency as a Tool for Foreign Policy: An Exploration of the Implications of United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 1:58 pm
Rosenbury In the landmark case Lawrence v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 4:02 pm
., Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 11:32 am
(relisted after the Jan. 7, Jan. 14, Jan. 21, Feb. 18 and Feb. 25 conferences) Texas v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 11:31 am
State of Texas, 379 U.S. 476 (1965), drafters of the Constitution were all too familiar with general warrants that gave British officials blanket authority to search imported goods, and sought to prohibit general warrants in the Constitution. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 4:30 am
Details are here, and the contest is open to all U.S. lawyers from any state. [read post]
10 May 2011, 5:26 am
Texas. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 9:28 pm
§ § 1-16, to the exclusion of any provisions of state law that are inconsistent with the federal act. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 3:42 pm
Batson v. [read post]
Guest Post: In Rush to Invalidate Patents at Pleadings Stage, Are Courts Coloring Outside the Lines?
1 Jul 2015, 3:30 pm
These Federal Circuit cases teach that it is acceptable to consider matters outside of the complaint, as confirmed by Affinity Labs of Texas v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 2:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 10:36 am
By Marty Lederman and David LubanThis coming Friday, the Supreme Court Justices are scheduled to consider, at conference, the government’s nominal “petition for certiorari” in No. 17-654, Hargan v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 7:13 am
Sachs, in which the court will determine when an entity is an “agent” of a “foreign state” under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, and Ocasio v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 4:00 am
Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans), and government-issued trademarks (Matal v. [read post]
