Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. "
Results 5221 - 5240
of 8,927
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2011, 3:14 am
As if that isn’t nutty enough, they also believe that the United States is too nice to homosexuals, and therefore this magic space zombie jew and his father (who is the same person as the magic space zombie jew) do bad things to America and Americans to punish us all for not killing homosexuals. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 5:57 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 11:09 am
Despite U.S. court’s dismissal of these cases, that the United States tortured and abused many men in pursuit of its so-called “war on terror” is not in dispute. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 11:58 am
Instituted by the America Invents Act (AIA), IPRs allow a petitioner to request that the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) reconsider and cancel claims of a U.S. patent under certain circumstances. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 5:43 am
Joseph Abbey v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 11:48 pm
The Survey is intended as a service to fellow teachers and students of conflicts law, both within and outside the United States. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 3:48 pm
Special procedures are either an individual (called "Special Rapporteur" or "Independent Expert") or a working group composed of five members, one from each of the five United Nations regional groupings: Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean, Eastern Europe and the Western group. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 10:00 am
Through this case, Oglala Sioux Tribe v. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
Community Financial Services Association of America (2023) November Sitting: United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 9:00 am
Vanessa Absher, Lynda Mitchell and United States of America v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 8:48 am
Indeed, an old 3d Circuit case, Donovan v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 2:15 pm
The complaint filed in California, Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America et al. v. the Departments of Homeland Security and Labor, et al., challenges both the Strengthening Wage Protections for the Temporary and Permanent Employment of Certain Aliens in the United States Rule and the Strengthening of the H-1B Nonimmigrant Visa Classification Rule. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 8:57 pm
(“Tessera”) filed a complaint alleging violations of Section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain semiconductor chips with minimized chip package size and products containing same by reason of infringement of U.S. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 2:01 pm
Last time the CJEU reviewed US privacy law, in Schrems v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 3:43 pm
United States of America, No. 15-11877(September 26, 2017)Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of AlabamaPanel: Ed Carnes, Chief Judge, Rosenbaum and Dubina, Circuit JudgesEd Carnes, Chief Judge: Reversed and RemandedThe full text of the decision can be found here:http://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/files/201511877.pdfFighting for you or a friend. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 6:18 am
Operation Technology, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 3:43 pm
United States of America, No. 15-11877(September 26, 2017)Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of AlabamaPanel: Ed Carnes, Chief Judge, Rosenbaum and Dubina, Circuit JudgesEd Carnes, Chief Judge: Reversed and RemandedThe full text of the decision can be found here:http://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/files/201511877.pdfFighting for you or a friend. [read post]
How Jack Smith May Charge Trump PAC with Fraudulent Fundraising Within the Bounds of First Amendment
24 Aug 2023, 5:55 am
” United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
United States of America, 2015 SCC 62 (35838) The Minister’s decision to extradite was upheld: reviewed the relevant facts, applied the correct legal principles to the submissions and evidence, gave serious consideration to the best interests of the children and weighed them with other relevant considerations. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 11:29 am
” The Seventh Circuit considered the United States Supreme Court’s recent decisions on marriage equality. [read post]
