Search for: "United States v. David"
Results 5221 - 5240
of 6,869
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm
[Refer: David Gallai, `Polygraph evidence in federal courts: Should it be admissible? [read post]
16 May 2011, 9:40 am
The Ninth Circuit’s Decision in Addington v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:48 am
AP (Trinidad & Tobago) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 551 (12 May 2011) ? [read post]
14 May 2011, 7:40 pm
Here is yesterday's opinion from the D.C.Circuit in United States v. [read post]
14 May 2011, 11:27 am
United States, 357 U.S. 301, 313-14 (1958) the United States Supreme Court held that it was unlawful to arrest the defendant on criminal charges when a warrantless arrest was conducted by police officers breaking and entering the defendant‘s apartment without expressly announcing the purpose of their presence or demanding admission. [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:28 pm
However, Article 9 does not apply to the extent that a statute, regulation, or treaty of the United States preempts it. [read post]
13 May 2011, 12:30 pm
On Wednesday, April 27, 2011, the United States Supreme Court decided AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 8:00 am
The lawsuit asks that the court “Declare that the prolonged seizure of [David’s] laptop computer and other electronic devices and the review, copying, retention and dissemination of their contents without reasonable suspicion violates the Fourth and First Amendments to the United States Constitution. [read post]
12 May 2011, 2:59 am
David Adlerstein is city editor of the newspaper. [read post]
10 May 2011, 8:52 am
It is unlikely that our Great Leader, prime minister Camerondirect, will feel the need to park a tiger ( a euphemism/synonym for vomiting which I have used for 30 years) after reading the European Court of Human Rights decision in MOSLEY v UNITED KINGDOM. [read post]
10 May 2011, 8:42 am
Rept. 100-576, at 921 (1988). [7] United States v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 7:57 pm
The Supreme Court held in Cotton Corporation of India v United Industrial Bank AIR 1983 SC 1272:"[I]gnoring all the relevant considerations, one cannot bodily import English decisions in our system to develop a hybrid legal system and one cannot be so hypnotised by English decisions to overlook legislative changes introduced in Indian Law. [read post]
9 May 2011, 5:48 am
Clemens alleged that “the instant criminal case is motivated by relationships Assistant United States Attorney David Tobin allegedly has with Pfaff and other individuals involved in the prior civil actions. [read post]
9 May 2011, 4:28 am
(IPKat) United States US General The USTR Special 301 Report released: some initial reactions (TechnoLlama) (Knowledge Ecology International) (Public Knowledge) (Michael Geist) (Public Knowledge) (Patent Docs) Protective orders put at risk by new bill – Sunshine in Litigation Act (Patent Docs) US Patents Making the patenting process faster (Patenthink) USPTO official ‘optimistic’ that Green Patent Fast Track will be extended again (Green Patent Blog) US Patents… [read post]
9 May 2011, 1:38 am
The real story is less exciting, but nonetheless not devoid of interest: "President of the Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys Alasdair Poore has praised the Head of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) for his readiness to listen to international users of the American IP system. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:31 am
[Update] On 6 May 2011 Mr Justice Tugendhat gave judgment in the case of Bacon v Automattic [2011] EWHC 1072 (QB) – a Norwich Pharmacal application in which he held that the operators of WordPress and Wikipedia could be served with the order in the United States by Email. [read post]
8 May 2011, 4:02 pm
") United States v. [read post]
7 May 2011, 5:15 am
Joffe practices before federal courts, the United States tax courts and also in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
6 May 2011, 11:21 am
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona David G. [read post]
5 May 2011, 11:17 am
United States. [read post]
