Search for: "v. JONES" Results 5221 - 5240 of 9,905
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2012, 8:29 am by familoo
Keith Tallon Cook Taylor Caroline Landes   McMillan Williams Helen MacDonald Aitken Associates Martin Wray Aitken Associates Kelly Wild   Aitken Associates Peter Harris Harris Temperley Caron Theobalds Harris Temperley Stewart Hughan Harris Temperley Nina Shaw  Harris Temperley Philip Wilkins  Hudgell & Partners Elizabeth Bendall Sternberg Reed Gordon Reed Sternberg Reed Darren Ward Sternberg Reed Jenny Morrison Morrison Spowart Karen Forrester Mackesys Caroline… [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:39 am by Steve Hall
On Friday, the Arkansas Supreme Court ruled in Hobbs v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:27 am by Ken Shigley
Jones, 260 Ga.App. 791, 581 S.E.2d 360 (2003), in which Braves star Andruw Jones threw a ball that went into the stands striking a spectator. [read post]
23 Jun 2012, 7:10 pm by Zachary Spilman
Jones, 68 M.J. 465 (C.A.A.F. 2010)(“returning to” the elements test for determining LIOs). [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 10:56 am by Erik J. Heels
FunnyJunk: An Object Lesson In How To Deal With Litigious Internet Trolls (2012-06-12) The Oatmeal v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 10:09 am by Eric E. Johnson
” Speaking of Blog Law Online, I definitely recommend Eric’s recent post on the Sixth CIrcuit’s decision in the Jones v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 10:59 am by Chris Kennebeck
  Parts I through V of the MCM are rules prescribed by the President pursuant to his Article 36 rule-making authority. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
The Appellate Division, citing Jones v Filkins, 238 AD2d 954, said that the removal of an official from office pursuant to Public Officers Law §36 "generally will not be granted absent allegations of self-dealing, corrupt activities, conflict of interest, moral turpitude, intentional wrongdoing or violation of a public trust[,]” while allegations of  “minor neglect of duties, administrative oversights, or violations of law do not, in general, warrant… [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 11:13 am by clay
Further, the court cited precedence where a person might reasonably infer that someone wearing a Confederate flag on their clothing might “harbor racial bias against African-Americans (United States v. [read post]