Search for: "Billings v. United States" Results 5241 - 5260 of 10,152
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2015, 6:26 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
To pay what you owe, make your check or money order payable to “United States Treasury” for the full amount due. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 3:20 pm by Stephen Bilkis
With the exception of the United States Constitution's Page 1004 proscription of bills of attainder and ex post facto laws, there is no provision in either the Federal or State Constitutions expressly concerned with retroactive legislation. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 7:18 am by Joel R. Brandes
  Anthimos Panteleris, a citizen of Australia, and Aalison Panteleris, a citizen of the United States, married in the United States in 2005. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
The ACA provides that territories of the United States (e.g., Guam) are “States,” for purposes of this law. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 4:22 am by SHG
  Not that it was some long-haired hippie throw-back to the Warren Court, but that there was a long tradition of the top court refusing to trot in lock-step with the United States Supreme Court when it came to finding novel excuses to ignore the Bill of Rights, or the local flavor, Article I, § 12 of the New York Constitution. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 11:38 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
Use the following addresses instead (or click here for more info): If you’re sending a payment along with your filing, make your check or money order payable to “United States Treasury” for the amount due. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 8:56 am by WIMS
EPA Clean Water Rule: WOTUS Field Hearing #2: Impacts of the Proposed Waters of the United States Rule on State and Local Governments and Stakeholders Field Hearing #1: Impacts of the Proposed Waters of the United States Rule on State and Local Governments and Stakeholders <> Nation's first federal combined solar power purchase … [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 11:47 am by Stephen Bilkis
Page 1 2009 NY Slip Op 51445(U) THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 4:11 pm by Stephen Bilkis
"); 554 US at 625 ("We therefore read [United States v] Miller [, 307 US 174 (1939),] to say only that the Second Amendment does not protect those weapon not typically possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes, such as short-barreled shotguns. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 11:38 am by Jeff Welty
Or does the existence of inexpensive drones present a novel Fourth Amendment concern that will require a novel doctrine to address it, as the Supreme Court arguably charted new courses regarding GPS tracking in United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:51 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Maple Drive Farms v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 4:20 am by Ben
Preska, Chief United States District Court Judge for the Southern District of New York, rule [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
United States, the United States Supreme Court is currently considering whether lengthening a completed routine traffic stop for a brief narcotics dog sniff violates the Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable seizures. [read post]