Search for: "DEFENDER SECURITY COMPANY" Results 5241 - 5260 of 17,837
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2010, 1:30 pm by Heather Young
"Companies that follow guidelines such as those suggested in Chubb's special report may be able to better defend such claims; and fiduciary liability insurance may help manage the defense costs. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:12 am by Andrew S. Boutros and John Schleppenbach
Finally, secure your network and facilities by distributing materials on a need-to-know basis: Don’t let your entire workforce have access. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 1:12 pm by Resnick Law Group, P.C.
The whistleblower protection provisions of § 806 apply to companies that have securities registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or that are required to file reports under that statute. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 9:33 am by William McGrath
In the words of Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer, "[t]his indictment reflects our commitment to holding individuals, as well as companies, accountable for violations of the FCPA. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 7:03 am by Jay Levine and Devan Flahive
The defendants argued that the agreement is an attempt to protect the operational and data security integrity of their respective DMS systems. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 7:03 am by Jay Levine and Devan Flahive
The defendants argued that the agreement is an attempt to protect the operational and data security integrity of their respective DMS systems. [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:14 pm by Ben Kostyack
The securities fraud prosecutions resulted in the main defendant, the former CEO of a publicly traded company, being sentenced to 10 years in jail, and it is one of the first successful prosecutions for securities fraud alleging violations of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 12:21 pm by Mehmet Munur
By Mehmet MunurA district court in Maryland recently upheld a real estate company’s website terms of use, but held that the unauthorized use by the defendants and the lost revenue from this unauthorized access did not satisfy “loss” as defined by the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 10:06 pm by Kevin LaCroix
 The antitrust lawsuits primarily target the company defendants. [read post]
” Furthermore, Kwok also ruled that the prosecution could establish the defendant’s mens rea by proving that the defendant, aware of the seditious intent within a publication, disregarded the consequence of publishing it. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 1:41 pm by Richard J. Harknett
Reporting suggests that Russian cyber capabilities were directed at seizing control of a system administration software update download widely used by U.S. federal agencies and private companies. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 12:57 pm by Zoe Tillman
Agency for International Development contractor, RTI International, and the private security company RTI hired, Unity Resources Group in the death of his daughter, Genevia Jalal Antranick. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 1:03 pm by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Section 806 of SOX prohibits discrimination against employees who engage in protected whistleblowing activities and work for publicly traded companies subject to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. 18 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 11:25 am by Eugene Volokh
I would think that in many such situations the bodyguard’s own Second Amendment rights — including such rights exercised in a place that the bodyguard and the protected person are using as a temporary home — should prevail, at least if the bodyguard is responsible to a security company even though he is “employed for” the company’s client. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 10:41 am
"We look forward to showing the court and jury how Qualcomm is using ParkerVision's technology despite the legal patent protections that we have expended a great deal of time and capital to secure. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 12:38 pm by Howard Knopf
According the AP report as carried in US News and World Report:A federal judge has dismissed a movie company's Internet piracy complaint against 34 Oregonians, saying the company was unfairly using the court's subpoena power in a "reverse class-action suit" to save on legal expenses and possibly to intimidate defendants into paying thousands of dollars for viewing a movie that can be bought or rented for less than $10. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 12:38 pm by Howard Knopf
According the AP report as carried in US News and World Report:A federal judge has dismissed a movie company's Internet piracy complaint against 34 Oregonians, saying the company was unfairly using the court's subpoena power in a "reverse class-action suit" to save on legal expenses and possibly to intimidate defendants into paying thousands of dollars for viewing a movie that can be bought or rented for less than $10. [read post]