Search for: "Grant v. People"
Results 5241 - 5260
of 16,989
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2021, 8:29 am
The decision was issued by summary order, without precedential effect (Barron v. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 10:22 am
The law should also grant courts the power to craft equitable remedies for persons like the plaintiffs in Li v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 4:07 am
In 15 of these 18 cases, at least some of the remedies granted (whether substantive access to shelter, education, medical care, or procedural safeguards protecting such access) could have been granted without invoking constitutional guarantees. [read post]
In Colorado, Repair Vendors Can Bring First-Party Bad Faith Actions For Amounts Owed From an Insurer
7 Nov 2012, 2:14 pm
The trial court agreed and granted the motion. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 7:53 am
No. 198 v. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 2:51 am
The action opposing the grant of the patent was brought by Motorola Mobility. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 1:03 pm
Of course, other Supreme Court precedents, like Oregon v. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 2:53 am
See Jacobson v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 6:58 am
Coverage of yesterday’s grant in Moore v. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 6:44 am
In Callaham v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 4:39 am
We all know that there are plenty of people occupying accommodation in those two categories. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 1:48 pm
Land O’Lakes has not yet filed an answer or commented publicly. [1] Complaint at 1-2, WWF Operating Co., v. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 10:27 am
The fund provided assistance in UMG v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 5:53 am
DVPO v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 4:15 am
In a media release, the penal reform charity notes that in its experience of working in prisons, carrying out research and representing young people in custody, “segregating vulnerable and disturbed people tends to make their problems worse”. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 3:26 am
UNISON’s appeal to the Supreme Court was born out of judicial review proceedings it initiated against the enactment of the Fees Order for (i) interfering unjustifiably with the right of access to justice under (a) common law and (b) EU law, (ii) for frustrating the operation of Parliamentary legislation granting employment rights; and (iii) for discriminating unlawfully against women and other protected groups. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 9:54 am
By Eric Goldman Cammarata v. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 3:32 pm
See, e.g., Does 1–6 v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 2:50 am
"This is an action for legal malpractice arising from the defendant' s representation of the plaintiff in the action entitled People a/the State a/New York v. [read post]
