Search for: "Gunning v. Doe"
Results 5241 - 5260
of 5,330
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2007, 2:54 pm
But instead of punching a wall, he takes out a gun and shoots her unoccupied car (and takes an ice pick to one of the tires).N0t a good thing, obviously. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 8:03 am
Texas (06-984, cert. docs) and Doe v. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 1:54 am
A217A Pheffer (MS) -- Establishes the identity theft prevention and mitigation unit
No Same as
BLURB : Exec. identy theft prev mitgn unt
First Act: 01/03/07 referred to consumer affairs and protection
Last Act: 04/17/07 reported referred to ways and means
A2619 McDonough (MS) -- Requires electronic monitoring for certain sex offenders
No Same as
BLURB : Cor. elctrnc mntrng crtn sx ofndr
First Act:… [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 1:17 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal PracticeProbationer's Diminished Privacy Expectation, Reasonable Suspicion Justified Search Revealing Gun United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 7:23 am
" Does this text imply an individual right to own and use guns? [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 6:44 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 6:02 am
Grimaldi, 993 F.2d 1002, 1004-05 (1st Cir. 1993) (holding that a New Hampshire State Prison practice of requiring nonprivileged outgoing mail to be submitted for inspection in unsealed envelopes does not violate prisoners' constitutional rights); Smith v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 3:51 am
Without more, this does not amount to a constructive entry. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 1:04 pm
An 1886 decision (Presser v. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 4:48 pm
It's Ford v. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 12:03 pm
Seeing a shotgun in a car justified a Long search for the gun and the person of the defendant. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 9:07 am
This sort of uncertainty is typical in litigation of this sort -- one reason why I like to show my students in Constitutional Law the excellent film about Brown v. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 11:34 pm
And I think it does have a deterrence effect. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 4:20 am
But the court does not believe the distinction is material, and the omission of the hotel information does not amount to a material omission. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 11:13 pm
Does this mean their insured won't also be able to write an article? [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 7:30 am
Gray v. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 5:12 am
Further, pursuant to Terry, the police were justified in approaching Defendant with drawn guns, see United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 7:06 pm
Mann v. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 3:05 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 4:42 pm
By Eric Goldman U.S. v. [read post]
