Search for: "He v. Holder"
Results 5241 - 5260
of 5,733
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2009, 4:33 am
We are amazed that the case settled at all, but confess not to have seen anything by Justice Gische's decision in Bellinson Law LLC. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:30 am
As the Supreme Court held in State Farm v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 8:59 pm
Kahn v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 6:57 am
The Court ruled in State v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 3:59 am
The case is State v. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 6:51 pm
-->-->*-->* Document published online at Internet Law & Regulation-->Commentary & discussion:[]-->--> -->-->BY MARC BOURGEOISTestimony in day four of Sony v. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 11:32 am
You can read the decision in Fisher v Brooker [2009] UKHL 41, in full and hot off the internet here and here.The Lord Law Lords (including one Legal Lady: Baroness Hale, who does remember the 1960s) have ruled that Fisher, who claimed he wrote the haunting pseudo-Bach organ melody which opened the song, is entitled to a share of future royalties. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 9:40 am
In fact, a period of 13 months and 18 days had elapsed between the Supreme Court’s ruling in Boumediene v. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 5:36 pm
" He said that "EBITDA is the stupidest thing I ever heard emanate from Wall Street. [read post]
25 Jul 2009, 8:52 am
In Zacharias v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 12:19 am
In Blanch v. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 5:51 am
Doane v. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 10:25 pm
No. 1 v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 7:20 pm
Holders v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 9:54 pm
The promoter explains that he is the holder of a special secret (how he became privy to it, we’ll never know) that he is willing to share for a small fee (small because “what’s $10,000 if you’re gonna save a lifetime’s worth of taxes? [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 3:15 pm
Right: the IPKat runs so speedily to deliver his comments to the IPO on Case C-168/09 that he forgets his tabby coat ...The questions referred are as follows: "1. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 11:56 am
Since CAIP v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:30 am
" The Hope opinion also contains a discussion of whether the holder of the trade secret had taken reasonable steps to protect the information. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 12:36 am
Holder a victory. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:04 am
A patent holder should know what he owns, and the public should know what he does not. [read post]
