Search for: "House v. House"
Results 5241 - 5260
of 41,326
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2012, 5:10 pm
In fact, they do not reside in that house at all, but in a separate house a few blocks away. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 4:58 am
New England In-House has an article on LG v. [read post]
29 Sep 2007, 1:08 pm
The Intent Use of Protected Speech or Activity As Evidence Does Not Mean that a Cause of Action is a SLAPP Cause of ActionDepartment of Fair Employment & Housing v. 1105 Alta Loma Road Apartments, LLC (Sept. 5, 2007, B194891, Second District)18 p. opinionAn action is a SLAPP action only if it is based on the defendant's protected free speech or petitioning activity. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 5:24 am
As a reminder, in case one were needed, that undertakings to the Court in ASB cases should be considered very carefully indeed comes Circle 33 Housing Trust Limited v Kathirkmanathan (2009) CA (Civ Div) 16/7/2009 [Not on Bailii yet, available as note on lawtel]. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 1:04 pm
The case is State v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 5:56 am
Only tangentially relevant to housing law, but R v Charles [2009] EWCA Crim 1570 is a decision of the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) dealing with the question of burden of proof for a “reasonable excuse” defence when charged with breaching an ASBO. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 4:03 pm
Ricky Edwards-Tubb v JD Wetherspoon plc [2011] EWCA Civ 136 Another brief note to mention this case which, despite not being housing-related in any way, is important in any matter where an expert is to be instructed. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 3:13 pm
On October 18, 1972, in the Senate debate concerning the Noise Control Act of 1972, then-Senator John V. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 10:53 am
Craftrule Ltd v 41-60 Albert Palace Mansions (Freehold) Ltd [2010] EWHC 1230 (Ch) is the first higher court decision on the meaning of "self-contained part of a building" in the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 9:42 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in Cheeks v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 4:03 pm
Ricky Edwards-Tubb v JD Wetherspoon plc [2011] EWCA Civ 136 Another brief note to mention this case which, despite not being housing-related in any way, is important in any matter where an expert is to be instructed. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 12:43 am
PDLL v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 2:57 am
This morning the House of Lords, looking slightly unfamiliar without Lord Hoffmann in the line-up, gave its decision in Generics (UK) Limited and others v H Lundbeck A/S [2009] UKHL 12, dismissing Generics' appeal against the much-discussed decision of the Court of Appeal (equally unfamiliar with Lord Hofffmann in the starring role) on the application of the concept of "insufficiency" to the validity of a granted patent.In short, their Lordships -- with Lords Scott,… [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 10:53 am
Craftrule Ltd v 41-60 Albert Palace Mansions (Freehold) Ltd [2010] EWHC 1230 (Ch) is the first higher court decision on the meaning of "self-contained part of a building" in the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 6:07 am
Davis, ABA Journal] Obama plan for mass refinance overriding terms of mortgages “could permanently drive housing finance costs higher” [James Pethokoukis] In Sackett v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 1:40 pm
The bill overturns Ledbetter v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 5:27 am
And I had to walk a huge distance until I could find a house that allowed me to pimp their wireless access. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 8:37 pm
J. walked to her mother’s house two miles away. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 12:37 pm
The statute says the house has to be "currently" inhabited. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:21 pm
This is my fucking house. [read post]
